no
2006-08-05 20:26:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by dt 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
You cannot call St.Paul a false prophet without telling what constitute a true or a false prophet.
To a believing Christian,St Paul has to be a true prophet,otherwise, the entire creed will be false.
But to an ordinary Jew at that time,St John did not conform to a true prophet as his teaching was different from the Law.In fact the matter was a big issue and was brought up to the attention of the early church leader and they had to sent someone to correct Paul's teaching .
2006-08-05 21:30:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by jurgen 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
St. Paul is not even a prophet, so he cannot be a false prophet. There are lots of religious groups that don't believe in St. Paul....like all non-Christian groups.
2006-08-05 20:32:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Christian Churches do think that had to go to a different religious book to find his name. Its called THE OTHER BIBLE under chapter 6/ACTS the acts of Paul(Christian Apocrypha). So he had a different view of Christs words and has been relegated to non conical status.
2006-08-05 20:40:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I myself have questioned many of his words his letters are not the Gospel he was an ex pharase so indoctrinated with the Jewish faith but he did see Jesus was the Messiah and was guided by God. but we must remember his letters were writ en to specific churches at that time each church had its own problem his letters are noit Christian laws and should not be taught as such. each letters has to be read in line with the church it was aimed at. some is good advice but not all is rel event. the Gospels are Mathew mark Luke and John I do not think there is any church completely reject him but as with all the bible it must be read while seeking Gods guidance
2006-08-05 20:33:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
right that's an occasion of ways Christian do no longer question what they study it the Bible. every physique who can study could word the discrepancies in the bills on Paul's journey highway to Damascus. the two the author of the e book of Acts exchange into improper or Paul lied in as he stated the tale. additionally Paul lied to the Pharisees to cause them to argue. the two way this blows holes in the thought the Bible is the perfect and inherent word of God.
2016-10-01 12:57:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Unitarians are one. Mormons, Jehovah Witness, and others do not follow Pauline doctrine. Muslims do not follow Paul.
Paul wasn't a false prophet, he was the original "anti-Christ."
2006-08-05 20:28:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by Left the building 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe the only unfaithful disciple was Judas who died and was replaced. St. Paul walked in Christs footsteps.Can you prove that he ever taught anything that conflicted with Christ and His teachings?
Peace Be With You,
Debra
2006-08-05 20:27:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by Debra M. Wishing Peace To All 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I call him the "anti-Christ". Noone, I repeat NOONE has hurt Christianity and teachings of Jesus more than this guy.
2006-08-05 22:14:53
·
answer #9
·
answered by Mesum 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
He is as real as false CHRISTIANITY MAKES HIM --- Believe me or burn in hell My GOD is a telemarketer--- REMEMBER DO NOT DENIE THE TELEMARKETER <>{{?>?><"+_:>
2015-01-13 04:17:48
·
answer #10
·
answered by ivisableman 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hindu, and Buddhist That's all that I know of.
2006-08-05 20:30:29
·
answer #11
·
answered by Dragonpack 3
·
0⤊
0⤋