My answer---- Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of happieness.
2006-08-05 15:52:22 · 13 answers · asked by ltlwzl 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Civic Participation
An intertwining mess of people, races, religion, languages, economic barriers, and endless laws...............
2006-08-05 16:02:04 · answer #1 · answered by lvillejj 4 · 10⤊ 5⤋
Still free, some brave, some liberty, but not for long.
2006-08-05 16:05:46 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The greatest place on the Earth to live!
2006-08-05 18:42:19 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Land of the Free, Home of the Brave...sometimes.
2006-08-05 15:56:43 · answer #4 · answered by swede700 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the two factors can use the present VA bloodbath to greater their argument. the professional-gun human beings can say, "If the regulations weren't so strict then somebody could have shot the guy in the previous he killed maximum of folk." The anti-gun human beings will argue in prefer of banning all weapons. for my area, i wouldn't in any respect be in prefer of giving up my perfect to very own and carry a gun. The regulations in basic terms harm regulation abiding voters, criminals do no longer care what the regulation is. that's argued greater, maximum of weapons are produced and maximum of are already obtainable unaccounted for, i do no longer see any user-friendly answer to the gun concern in the u . s .. one ingredient that could be performed at recent is to end the drug warfare and concentration greater on the unlawful gun commerce. One argument could be to shrink or ban the manufacture of recent weapons, this could force up the fee of latest weapons and positioned the undesirable at a draw back, they have an equivalent perfect to shelter themselves. one ingredient to contemplate, that's finally the activity of the human beings to shelter ourselves, take the 9/11 terrorist assaults as an occasion, each and all of the money, intelligence, miltary, police, air marshalls, etc. in the international could no longer end some adult men with razor blades, in the tip it exchange into the voters who defended themselves, armed with no longer something greater desirable than guidance, and delivered down the airplane in Pennsylvania and stored who knows what share lives. yet then one ought to argue if the terrorists have been allowed to convey weapons on board then no person could've been waiting to end them. i for my area do no longer understand then answer, different than to declare i wouldn't in any respect decide for to provide up my weapons, ever, with the aid of fact that's a unfavorable international we live in and that i believe lots greater secure being armed.
2016-10-01 12:46:27 · answer #5 · answered by andresen 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Far Out Man!!
2006-08-05 16:03:32 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The city on the hill, that if we're not carefull we'll loose
2006-08-05 16:22:38 · answer #7 · answered by TranquilStar 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Majority has obesity
McDonalds
and
Big SUVs
2006-08-05 16:10:52 · answer #8 · answered by Tulip 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I like living where even the poor people are fat.
2006-08-05 16:05:08 · answer #9 · answered by Rick 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
free country xcept taxes
2006-08-05 16:49:26 · answer #10 · answered by mike L 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She's the greatest.
2006-08-05 15:59:27 · answer #11 · answered by Huevos Rancheros 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋