English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

why are liberal nutjobs trying to turn the USA into a bunch os WUSSES?

2006-08-05 15:03:01 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Military

Is it time for the weak to perish under the steel-toed boot of Justice?

2006-08-05 15:08:21 · update #1

22 answers

Country boys can survive.

2006-08-05 15:25:31 · answer #1 · answered by Huevos Rancheros 6 · 1 1

It is not true that only the strong survive, That was Spencer's mistaken thesis. Darwin came along later and stated that those species most suited to adapting to a changing environment would flourish. (bonus points to anyone who remembers that in Darwin's final draft included the phrase, something like, "the species received the breath of life from God")

In other words, the clever will outlast the strong.

How do you figure that liberal nutjobs are trying to turn the USA into a bunch of wusses, any more than right wingnuts are trying to turn the USA into a fascist state?

What specific cases do you blame weakness on some nebulous left wing conspiracy?

It simply is the political process. In the USA, roughly 1/4 of the people are partisan conservatives, and roughly 1/4 of the people are partisan liberals.

I'm part of the mighty middle, which is comprised of the half of the population who are not content to follow jingoists. We are the swing vote, that determines the outcome of elections.

If you want our vote, come up with rational solutions to the greatest real world problems we face, instead of slogans or jingoism..


Answer to additional details: Well, if you are talking about weak minded, you might be an early candidate.

2006-08-05 15:09:29 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You know, there is a psych term called Passive-Aggressive Behavior. Typically the person who does it calls people names, or makes outrageous statements, then- when someone calls them on it, they whine- "I was just asking a question" or "Why are you so upset, I was just kidding"

If you had asked the only the first question, without the editorial opinion that follows, you might get some serious, thoughtful answers.
The way you have it set up now is that anyone who disagrees with you is a liberal wuss.
Come back when you grow up.

2006-08-05 15:12:49 · answer #3 · answered by roscoedeadbeat 7 · 0 0

Well, Mr. Gringo Gestapo, I guess your user name says it all, doesn't it?

You know, just as an aside, Darwin never said and never meant "the survival of the fittest." That was always journalistic jargon. He meant that members of a species that fit best into it's environment tended to survive longer than other members of the species. Sometimes that would mean getting bigger and physically stronger and sometimes it meant getting smaller and sometimes it meant getting smarter.

Talk softly, carry a big stick - works best.

2006-08-05 15:13:13 · answer #4 · answered by sonyack 6 · 0 0

Survival of the fittest is an idea that is only upheld in the wild. Here in civilization, we will fight to save anyone, no matter how weak. Not saying that there is anything wrong with that. That just isn't how things work with humans anymore.

2006-08-05 15:08:53 · answer #5 · answered by Jessica H 4 · 0 0

fake. sturdy has many meanings, sturdy physique, ideas, spirit, economic business enterprise account and so on. yet success has a lot to do with it. A typhoon comes into city and the soccer team is enjoying and all get killed, meanwhile the chess team is out of city enjoying a interest. So in that occasion, the sturdy died. In conflict, the sturdy circulate to conflict and die on a similar time as the vulnerable stay at homestead.

2016-09-28 23:01:22 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Same thing with police work...I'm a police officer and the current liberal trend is for lovey-dovey touchy-feely cops who love everyone, even criminals! Be nice and wear a smiley face instead of a badge. Some brutal, nasty criminals need to be treated the same way, not tickled with a feather duster!!!

2006-08-05 15:06:46 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No, the pen it mightier than the sword - brains beats brawn.

The reckless foreign policy of the administration is the reason for the total chaos in the Middle East.

2006-08-05 15:06:26 · answer #8 · answered by D 2 · 0 0

No..The French are still here...


And becuase Liberals are Because there Liberal Nazi Gay Loving, Towelhead F@#$ing, Tree Hugging Flag Burning , Baby Killing Anti-Christ Communist that live off wellfare

2006-08-05 15:07:08 · answer #9 · answered by DC D 2 · 1 0

Because they are foolish obviously, and they think that if they make up a bunch of things that makes them "sound" smart that it will be enough to intimidate others. It's completely ridiculous in my book.

2006-08-05 15:10:42 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers