English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

My husband and I are looking to name one of our children after a war vet. We would like to know the first and middle name. We would like to be able to tell our child the story of how they got their name one day. I know this may sound strange but we feel it is a good way to honor a vet. My husband is currently on his second deployment with the national guard so we are familiar with some people and their stories. Thanks.

2006-08-05 13:23:14 · 6 answers · asked by SSG wife 3 in Politics & Government Military

6 answers

Maybe your husband knows someone? Wouldn't you rather it be someone that he knows or knew?

2006-08-05 13:27:01 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Brandon Murphy hurt 3 times just went back in the 101st . The first p/h he got; he was the only one left from a hit to the bradley

2006-08-05 13:47:23 · answer #2 · answered by mike L 4 · 0 0

Yes, I knew people killed in the wars. I was wounded.
I suggest naming your child after someone you knew or know or after an acquaintance of your husband's.

2006-08-05 13:31:51 · answer #3 · answered by expatmt 5 · 0 0

MY HUSBAND IS CURRENTLY ON HIS SECOND DEPLOYMENT AND ONE OF HIS BUDDIES THAT DIED WAS NAMED WYATT...I DONT KNOW THE MIDDLE NAME...BUT THIS IS HOW IT WENT...MY HUSBAND WAS SENT HOME ON EMERGENCY LEAVE AND WYATT TOOK HIS PLACE...WELL IT JUST SO HAPPENED THAT WYATTS VEHICLE WAS BLOWN UP AND SOMETHING WENT RIGHT THROUGH HIS HEAD..MY HUSBAND IS STILL UPSET BUT I TOLD HIM THAT GOD DOESNT WANT HIM..IT WASNT HIS TIME TO GO....(THIS HAPPENED HIS FIRST DEPLOYMENT.)

2006-08-05 15:18:48 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

inspite of what you belive, what all of us can agree on is that slimy politicians might desire to be the final human beings making this call. If we circulate away it as much as them, they are going to circulate with regardless of is conventional on the time and gets them re-elected in view it quite is the motivation. at present, meaning advocating for gender equality which will have some extreme outcomes if it quite is the only determining element on regardless of if to place their lives on the line in a wrestle task. We spend billions on DOD personell so it would be a elementary expectation of mine that between the CO's interior the sector, the brass in the back of the strains, and the Pentagon team in DC somebody is clever adequate to make the call on the thank you to hire females interior the miltiary. human beings against it is going to probable strengthen, on the finished, females are weaker than adult males. Granted. in spite of the shown fact that, in an era of mechanized warfare, extreme-tech wrestle, etc, Rambo-esque actual potential would be much less of a element in maximum wrestle roles (different than particular forces). in addition to, some females are larger and greater advantageous than adult males so its achieveable what's the exception on the nationwide undemanding (females > adult males) might desire to become the rule of thumb between females interior the militia (females = or > adult males). final analysis: #a million Dont' have faith your Congressman to make this call; circulate away it as much as the experts interior the militia that have certainly been in wrestle and function the adventure. #2 We spend lots on our militia and the human beings who think of by using its physique of ideas- permit's use it! #3 custom gender arguments in keeping with potential won't suffice to argue that females might desire to be excluded from ALL wrestle roles end: If the commanders supply the golf green gentle, permit females serve it wrestle. save it subjective nevertheless because of the fact some situations could be greater risky than others.

2016-12-11 07:36:23 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Here is somebody I knew.

2006-08-05 16:52:56 · answer #6 · answered by MikeGolf 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers