English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Being constipated for 24 hours or.....having diarrhea for 24 hours??

2006-08-05 10:26:25 · 9 answers · asked by julean33 2 in Politics & Government Military

9 answers

omgg lol being constipated i would say... its too painful to last 24 hours.. and eww diarrhea is disgusting as well lol i would prefer to have that if i had to choose between the two loolzz wat a question

2006-08-05 10:33:14 · answer #1 · answered by 2luvly2btru 2 · 1 0

Having diarrhea for 24 hours is more dangerous than being constipated for that long. My physiology prof said that diarrhea is the number one killer world wide. (Seriously)

2006-08-05 17:32:32 · answer #2 · answered by Chris 4 · 0 0

Medically diarrhea would be more dangerous. You'd lose a lot of water and electrolytes not to mention all the nutrients that you eat. That kind of situation would have to come from some kind of sickness so chances are you would have it for a long time considering all the feces that would be on and around you.

2006-08-05 17:39:27 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i think having diarhea for 24 hours would be worse, i know that when i have it, i have a really upset stomach, but constipation i just feel full and dont eat much, doesnt hurt though.

2006-08-05 18:47:53 · answer #4 · answered by krystal 6 · 0 0

Being constipated.

2006-08-05 17:30:51 · answer #5 · answered by ma 2 · 0 0

being consitpated is worse if its just for 24 hours

2006-08-05 17:35:07 · answer #6 · answered by jessica_mornington 2 · 0 0

diarrhea

2006-08-05 17:32:41 · answer #7 · answered by duck_kreeves 3 · 0 0

oh the burning i guess

2006-08-05 21:30:39 · answer #8 · answered by mike L 4 · 0 0

either might kill you i think

2006-08-05 19:21:49 · answer #9 · answered by Timothy B 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers