English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Christianity its a science its not a religion, we get pi from it in 1 Kings 7.23 (it says pi is 3 by the way); so thats the math, it teaches us that the human was made out of dust from the ground in Genesis 2.7, and it states in clear plain English that the Earth is flat with four corners in both Revelation 7.1 and 20.8.

Why won't Christians just admit it, yours is a science its not a religion, the Holy Bible is a science book.

Just admit it, its a science Christians won't admit to.

2006-08-05 09:36:38 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

20 answers

Are you trying to be "creative" with your questions?

Look Dear, Christianity isn't a branch of Science so it isn't a Science. Science is based on theorems and scientific methods.

People think Christianity is just a system of doctrines and believes when Christianity is really a Relationship with God, it isn't an ideology, Christianity it's just based on the identity of Christ. Recognizing who is God and having a relationship with Him.

Science:Ability to produce solutions in some problem domain
Technology:The practical application of science to commerce or industry.

Did people used science at those times? Of course!! Every civilization has. Why are you mixing things up when is easy to comprehend?

2006-08-05 15:22:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4 3

Psuedo-science, at best. And your logic is flawed. My seventh grade social studies book talked about the extremely advanced mathmatical and astrological capabilities of the Mayans, but that didn't make it a math or astrology book. So the bible has math? So it says we're made from dirt? And so what if it states very clearly, plainly, and- just for the record- incorrectly that the Earth is flat? None of that is what the book is about. Again, psuedo science. It can be molded to partially fit some of the definition of science, but not entirely. Christianity is a religion.

2006-08-05 09:47:02 · answer #2 · answered by Jill J 2 · 0 0

Excellent question, simply brilliant!

The 'churchy' world won't like it, but hey, truth is truth, eh?

Ever check out "Science of Mind" by Ernest Holmes?
Excellent info within those pages my friend....

Religion requires a huge makeover before it can be functional to benefit humanity---especially Christianity---it's brainwash---been there, done that and survived. The above book was a major key to my survival.

Also, Bishop Spong's "Why Christianity Must Change or Die" is brilliant too!

2006-08-05 09:53:36 · answer #3 · answered by MamaChick 2 · 0 0

Say what? Lots of people call themselves Christians. That doesn't make them a Christian. I can call myself a car also, but that doesn't make me a car. Christianity isn't necessarily a "religion" it is a faith. Catholics, Lutherans and Methodists sometimes call themselves Christians. So do others. That doesn't mean anything.

The Holy Bible is the word of God. God can do anything he chooses to do. If he chose to put some science or math in the Bible, so what. That doesn't change the fact that the Bible is still the true word of God.

People who know their Bibles know that you shouldn't take things out of context. The Bible talks about murder so should we call it a murder mystery? The Bible talks about sex, so should we call it a sex manual? No matter what spin you put on it, it is still The Word of God.

2006-08-05 09:51:52 · answer #4 · answered by mar 4 · 0 0

oh i will reproduction and paste with out reading: with regard to the dome question is the place the Bible says God created the sunlight, moon, and stars. here is what the Bible says: God made the two great lighting fixtures, the extra desirable mild to manage the day, and the lesser mild to manage the night; He made the celebrities additionally. God positioned them interior the expanse of the heavens to grant mild on earth, (Genesis one million:sixteen-17, NASB) God made 2 great lighting fixtures--the extra desirable mild to manage the day and the lesser mild to manage the night. He additionally made the celebrities. God set them interior the expanse of the sky to grant mild on earth, (Genesis one million:sixteen-17, NIV) And God made 2 great lighting fixtures; the extra desirable mild to rule the day, and the lesser mild to rule the night: he made the celebrities additionally. And God set them interior the firmament of the heaven to grant mild upon the earth, (Genesis one million:sixteen-17, KJV) One word is "expanse" (or "firmament" interior the KJV) that's the Hebrew word "râqîya". the different 2 English words are "sky" and "heaven" (or "heavens"). interior the Hebrew, those words are actual a similar. there's no particular word that differentiates "sky" from "heaven," in view that they're each of a similar Hebrew word, "shâmayim." actually, it became into the translators determination whether to apply the word "sky" or "heaven." So, there's no differentiation whether the celebrities have been created interior the sky or heaven. Secondly, God defines the râqîya as being equivalent to the shâmayim: God stated as the expanse [râqîya] heaven [shâmayim]. And there became into night and there became into morning, a 2d day. (Genesis one million:8) So, opposite to the declare, the Bible does not say that the sunlight, moon and stars have been created interior the sky or atmosphere.

2016-09-28 22:49:52 · answer #5 · answered by regula 4 · 0 0

That is correct - Christianity is very scientific but you cited the wrong science. Have you heard of the law of correspondences? No? That is a shame.

http://www.mechanicsburgnewchurch.org

2006-08-05 09:41:55 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Wow four things in the whole Bible that aren't scientific and 3 of them being symbolic/meant for interpritation.

2006-08-05 09:45:04 · answer #7 · answered by John 2 · 0 0

Ok lets put it this way. Grandfather Darwin said it himself everything came from something that even he cant explain Darwin believed that there was a god, because there are things even he cant explain. My grandfather is a priest. And Darwin admits himself there is something higher above.

2006-08-05 09:43:37 · answer #8 · answered by Ryan O 1 · 0 0

Science? Dang, and all this time I thought it was a group of fiction stories made to scare children and illiterate people!

2006-08-05 09:42:28 · answer #9 · answered by angel 6 · 0 0

whats to admit? its all how you view it. sure it could be a science, or it could not, its all how you prefer to think of it. But I'm game for it being called a science. because than I'm a scientist :P

2006-08-05 09:41:00 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers