English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

..why do scientists accept it as fact when it violates the scientific method? Is it because they wish not to be Judged by God?

2006-08-05 09:08:19 · 8 answers · asked by Help 3 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

You talk of evidence but no one provides any. You can't dispute the leap second. You can't dispute human footprints and dinosaur footprints together.

Evolution is only faith based. Micro evolution is talked about in the flood in genesis. Macro evolutoin is a fairy tale. Can anyone prove that wrong?

2006-08-05 09:20:05 · update #1

8 answers

Evolution is really a type of religion, but they don't want to admit it.

2006-08-05 09:15:16 · answer #1 · answered by pennypincher 7 · 1 5

Wow, that is a pretty rough statement... Evolution is the only "theory" that provides scientific evidence. Fossil records, carbon dating, etc.

creationisms evidence is their lack of evidence... "how can this be possible wothout a god"

creationists believe that the second law of thermodynamics does not permit order to arise from disorder, and therefore the macro evolution of complex living things from single-celled ancestors could not have occurred. The creationist argument is based on their interpretation of the relationship between probability and a thermodynamic property called "entropy." They are wrong in their interpretation, as is explained in the last link in my sources

2006-08-05 16:24:03 · answer #2 · answered by E-Rock 3 · 0 0

Your statement "since Evolution has no evidence and is faith based" is false.

You need to take a course in logic to make a more convincing argument next time.

"You can't dispute human footprints and dinosaur footprints together."

Disproven by many credible scientists.

*****

You and your argument hve NO credibility.

2006-08-05 16:21:17 · answer #3 · answered by carl l 6 · 0 0

There's far more evidence for evolution than there is for God. Evolution is proven fact at micro-biological level, and works very well as a schema or theory for larger organisms' development. Stick that in your magical pipe of religious denial and smoke it.

2006-08-05 16:14:37 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I'm pretty sure there is evidence for evolution. If not, I have a lot of pictures of myself standing next to 6,000 year old bones in the Smithsonian when I believed them to be tens of thousands of years old, if not more. What a cruel joke those scientists are playing on us. Since some of you claim it is a religion, who shall I worship and confess my sins to? My local chemist? It is not us in denial.

2006-08-05 16:20:18 · answer #5 · answered by MishMash [I am not one of your fans] 7 · 0 0

There is quite a bit of evidence across many different fields of science which supports the theory of evolution.

2006-08-05 16:15:47 · answer #6 · answered by genaddt 7 · 0 0

Yes. They are soooo afraid of big bad scary God.

2006-08-05 16:13:25 · answer #7 · answered by Ann_Tykreist 4 · 0 0

150 years of evidence that supports it and none that refutes it...no evidence...this is a joke...

2006-08-05 16:13:06 · answer #8 · answered by bc_munkee 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers