So, Wal-Mart outsources to China etc., and gets unionized there when unions can't break their grip in the US, is that poetic justice or what?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060805/bs_nm/retail_china_union_dc_3
What do you think?
2006-08-05
04:41:21
·
9 answers
·
asked by
DAR
7
in
Politics & Government
➔ Immigration
gokart - I agree. I consider Wal-Mart an example of eroded wage and benefit standards exacerbated by prevelance of illegal immigration. This is clear in their battles with unions, however, unions aren't necessary to the equation. I am speaking of the principle of a fair wage.
yars - they don't, so far as I am able to tell by their actions on this topic.
2006-08-05
05:02:19 ·
update #1
Mendi8a - if Wal-Mart were a country it would have something like the 9th largest economy in the world. They are 'just a store' and are only more visible and more able to carve their own rules as all stores may wish to. However, as such they are indicative of a trend, and in this instance are part of the problem. I understand that you don't view it as a problem, and we disagree on that point.
2006-08-05
05:36:58 ·
update #2