considering our economic interest are in both places of the world, oil in the middle east, and business growth in asia, not including the natural resources held there
2006-08-05 04:25:50 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
I say neither. I say China will get tired of all this conflict and call in some of the US's financial chips. With our huge trade and budget deficits, it'll be a struggle to pay off some of our bills so we'll start cancelling fancy weapons systems and calling troops in from all the far-flung places they inhabit around the globe--or face a 5 million man Chinese behemoth.
2006-08-05 04:32:11 · answer #1 · answered by nora22000 7 · 2⤊ 5⤋
Check the news from the last 100 yrs, the middle east has always been a war, even before that. Where to begin...the Turkish people for the most part are "OK" with the USA, they may not love us, but they don't hate us for being Americans. Lebanon has NO army, or nothing to speak of, they are a country controlled by the Hezbo's for the most part, and if Israel will be left alone, they will soon bring all those trouble makers to room temperature soon enough. Iran is/has helped arm the Hezbo's but after seeing the what is happening in Lebanon, I think there "saber rattling" is getting really quiet. The lunatic running things in Korea will have to dealt with pretty soon because of his increasing missile testing, but don't be surprised if 7.62mm of diplomacy doesn't very soon bring him down.
2006-08-05 04:45:50 · answer #2 · answered by bigbadwolf 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I doubt America will stick there noses in Syria since there is nothing to steal like oil, and if it is for a peacekeeping situation they won't risk sending troops because it will be another war between military forces and there is no plan for a attack. Remember they suffered a bit in iraq. With Iran, its unclear but its more possible since Iran experienced earthquakes toppling its military so the Americans might get there hands on the oil there, but it'll be seriously risky to attack a super power even after the earthquakes remember that they have Russia as its ally and it might re act serious to this situation because they Iran and Russia border each other so if a missile affects the russian border then this will be taken as a act of war. And as for North Korea it won't happen Kim is trying to show off and if they will both engage in a war which I doubt America will suffer terribly because they wont be able to attack with missiles a lot since its ally SK might be affected and neither america wants to invade a country that's ready for them, remember they took serious casualties in Vietnam by a unprofessional army like viet cong but if they fight the Koreans they'll fight a serious and huge military since it has defensive positions ready, so america won't risk it.
2016-03-27 00:04:01 · answer #3 · answered by Nikki 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dont know if you have been watching the news for the past couple of years but we have already been in a war in the middle east.
2006-08-05 04:29:43 · answer #4 · answered by JB 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe it will be the middle east. N. Korea will gain nothing right now. There best bet is to just lay low until the next opportunity.
2006-08-05 04:30:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually I kind of hope someone pops a cap in The Fuhrer Bush's forehead and stops the war.
2006-08-05 04:31:22 · answer #6 · answered by theforce51 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah I second what SGT. B said. Since when did Turkey become a nation we would want to wage war on?
2006-08-05 04:32:08 · answer #7 · answered by sponggie 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
middle east
2006-08-05 04:29:53 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
War in the USA
2006-08-05 04:35:26 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
the us is afraid of a war with iran,....iran already has nuclear energy and it will use it,maybe iran can't bomb america but it can bomb israel completely
2006-08-05 04:41:25 · answer #10 · answered by doc. 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋