English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-08-05 03:29:34 · 23 answers · asked by Pete Allison 6 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

23 answers

I think the dinosaurs had all died out by that time, but it's a good question

2006-08-05 03:32:52 · answer #1 · answered by Wish 6 · 1 0

Possible. God himself put the animals on the ark. Noah was just told what to accept and keep. Read the account in Genesis chapters 5 and 6. People discount dinosaurs because of lack of fossil evidence around people. They also discount dragons and unicorns for the same reasons. I say that mankind has had a devastating influence on biology and evidence. If bones alone were used as evidence, then people would think that buffalo or bison in America was a myth. People were encouraged to "clean up" the mess made by the buffalo hunters. They did such a good job that there are almost no old bones left. If someone thought that the unicorn's horn were magic or help sexually, then you would find no more horns. People are destroying evidence of all sort. It is possible, though I personally doubt that dinosaurs were on the ark.

2006-08-05 10:50:42 · answer #2 · answered by Jack 7 · 0 0

My theory is different.Mind you, during those times the whole planet for ones self probably consisted of no more than a 300-500 mile radius.And when the flood came, it flooded that entire region.Not the entire world in general.And there were no dinosaurs on his ship.It was not in Indonesia.So there were no komono dragons on board.For his region, most of the animals were known.Even to this day, new(or to be correct, found) species are being discovered(found) everyday.And he did not have ALL creatures of the earth on his arc.Only the ones from his land.

2006-08-05 10:40:04 · answer #3 · answered by Mitchell B 4 · 0 0

Nope. Dinosaurs existed millions of years before Noah.

2006-08-05 10:34:19 · answer #4 · answered by Sick Puppy 7 · 0 0

I believe that they were, but I can't be too sure. Baby dinosaurs could have been taken on as either eggs or young ones, but simply couldn't cope with their new environment. Oxygen was probably less plentiful after the flood because if you look at the nose of a T-rex, it should be about the size of a horses nose.
And where would those animals get enough food to survive? It was probobly just too hard too keep them alive.

2006-08-05 10:35:35 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Noah's Ark, my friend, is a fable. It has taken thousands of scientists hundreds of years traveling thousands of miles over all 7 continents to classify the many hundreds of thousands of species we know of, not counting the other half that we haven't even gotten to yet. And you believe one unshaven weirdo in a skirt went globetrotting the world and collected ALL of them in a lifetime AND still had time to build one relatively miniscule boat that wouldn't even have had enough space to house even a FRACTION of the mammals alone? Get a grip.......

2006-08-05 10:35:56 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I don't think so but it's kind of difficult to imagine how the scientific and spiritual timelines interconnect. So I would say no based off the idea that we came after dinosaurs.

2006-08-05 10:37:31 · answer #7 · answered by in His arms 1 · 0 0

dinosaurs WERE on noah's ark cos both crocodiles and tortoises are dinosaurs

2006-08-05 10:49:45 · answer #8 · answered by banana_girl4578 2 · 0 0

no.why.humans came much after the dinosaurs.

2006-08-05 10:32:59 · answer #9 · answered by eagercurio 2 · 0 0

dinosaurs were here before Adam and Eve.

2006-08-05 10:33:45 · answer #10 · answered by His eyes are like flames 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers