Your question is really hard to answer, i agree that was not freedom of speech and it is just being disrespectful towards anothers religion , very offensive! and since in this mean world there are already so many problems I think its just another way to add to those problems,how to react to something that touches one so deeply ? There are times i think vengence is the only answer depending how deep the hurt , but then i try to settle down ,not easy to look the other way though, I really don't know what would be the best thing to do to handle this situation,I can only say that I was outraged for such bad behavior and insensitivity, best wishes to you Dody.
2006-08-04 21:34:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by Dody 3
·
14⤊
6⤋
I think freedom is not hurting some one else by abusing someone else's freedom. What I mean is: here is an example. I should allow the freedom to worship as you choose and you should allow me to worship as I choose. We should not make fun of each others religion. That was not right what that guy did to Muhammed in the news paper. That was not me and I didn't like it. I'm sorry for you he did it. I feel bad when I hear because I am a Christian, it is said I am an infidel and do not deserve to be alive and I should be exterminated. I say my prayers daily and every day I pray for blessings for my family and all the families of the world. It is only a small percentage of people in the world who abuse freedom of speech but they are the ones who they report about on television and the radio.
I hope I answered you question. I have a hard time expressing myself. I pray for peace.
2006-08-04 21:34:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by DeeJay 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
First, I'd say you are a complete imbecile for doing that and I'm sure you'd get sued, but there wouldn't be a riot with people committing arson and murder.
Second, it's funny how Muslim men who compel their women to wear full body coverings in public would find it acceptable to wear naked pictures of non-Muslim women in public. Hmm, ... that's not hypocritical or anything is it?
Third, naked pictures are pornography and displaying them in such a negative context in public where children would see them is not a wise idea. Surely, your perfect religion would condemn that action. There is a difference between the public display of cartoon caricatures and the public display of pornography.
2006-08-04 21:20:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by scifiguy 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Unfirtunately we do not have Freedom Legislation. Everyone choses his own vision of freedom of speach..
2006-08-04 21:07:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by Suomi 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
when it is islam ooooo yaaaaa no problem but when mel gibson is drunk and does not say any thing comparable 2 what denmark did 2 islam they r wheeling 2 kill him
2006-08-04 21:28:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by aaaaaa 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
as long as its not to incite hatrid I think few people would chose to wear pics of their perants naked to imbarising if you ever say them even
2006-08-04 21:12:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you did I would laugh. Mostly because you'd be arrested for public indecency.
2006-08-04 21:39:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by Luce's Darkness 4
·
1⤊
1⤋