Can you tell me the scientific findings that prove there is a "Creator"?

Question

I asked a questiona little while back about ignoring science, and I was informed that there is an entire body of scientific evidence that proved there is a God, or a creator... I am not an Athiest, but I an no religious extremest either... I am curious as to what this "new evidence" and scientific body of proof is... (The bible is not scientific proof)

Answer 1

There is no scientific proof

Answer 2

The proof there is a creator or there is not a creator?

The universe has been around for billions of years. Many religious people are wakening up to the fact that all religions are just man-made bunkum developed by simplistic human intelligence.

On a universal scale, human intellect does not have the ability to understand much of what is happening, why it happened, and what will happen in the future, so to fill the gaps in their minds they substitute artificial reasoning commonly referred to as religion.

Religion is an escape from the inability to reason intellectually, and because it’s easy to play make believe, further subsets are created like the Bible, Jesus, Adam, Eve etc, in order to justify the mental illusion.

Stephen Hawking suggested that if the universe was created then it is reasonable to assume it had a creator. Since human intellect is unable to determine whether the universe was created, religion takes over and assumes it was and calls the creator God. That’s nothing more than speculative conjecture and more bunkum.

Hawking has done groundbreaking research on black holes and the origins of the universe. He proposes that space and time have no beginning and no end. On Thursday 15 June 2006, Stephen Hawking said that the late Pope John Paul II once told scientists they should not study the beginning of the universe because it was the work of God.

Hawking, who didn't say when the meeting was held, quoted the pope as saying, "It's OK to study the universe and where it began. But we should not enquire into the beginning itself because that was the moment of creation and the work of God." Hawking asked the Pope "Does it require a creator to decree how the universe began or is the initial state of the universe determined by a law of science?"

If the Pope genuinely believed that God created the universe, why was the Pope scared of science investigating the subject and proving that God existed. The truth is more likely that the Pope doesn’t believe in God and doesn’t want science to prove in fact that God doesn't exist.

Answer 3

To answer this question, you have to get thinking on a somewhat logical and philisophical level. of course assuming that there is a creator, first of all we can't see him so that puts a damper on things. But if you take a look at the human body itself, the complexity, the design,.....it is a bunch a little pieces that work together to make our bodies work. How about the fact that a womans' vagina can start really small, stretch far enough to push a baby through, and then retract back to the small size after a certain amount of time. Or try taking a look at the cycle of photosythesis, how plants obtain food and at the same time provide oxygen. What about the human mind? how did thoughts come about, how are you able to speak......whether we evolved or not, all you have to do is look at nature. Everything has a design, the design lets us know that there is a creator. Do you think that it could have just happened....one day there was a 'big bang' and suddenly we were all here. Not possible. Well maybe a teeny bit possible but I think the odds are against it. You don't need the bible to tell you that there is a creator. Try looking at a leaf under a high powered microscope sometime and have someone one give you a quick lesson in botany. Then maybe you will see.

Answer 4

Can you tell me the scientific findings that prove there is not Creator?

Not evolution. God could have taken his sweet time making us, like any great artist works long and hard on a work that he loves, just to get it right.

Can you tell me the scientific findings that prove there was such a thing as the Big Bang, and that all matter came from nothing? This doesn't wash with the laws of physics. Nothing comes from nothing.

The fact is that there is little scientific poof of anything, except the blatantly obvious. Most science is just theory and conjecture. Remember when dinosaurs were just big lizards, now, supposedly, they had feathers. Science is always changing. It is not a constant. Science is not an exact science and neither is life. There is mystery and wonder, so many things science will never be able to explain. Science can not accurately prove why you exist or even if you really exist. Does this mean you don't exist. Who defines you? Likewise, who defines the Creator?

Answer 5

The Gaia Theory is becoming popular again. It's where the Earth is a planet-sized SIngle Cell Organism. The Electromagnetic Field surrounding the planet functions on the same principles as the Electrical Field in the Human Mind.

With Single Cell Organisms, they have a plasm membrane. The Earth functions on the same principles using the Electromagnetic Field to shift and move data. Electricity is the one thing that can pass through all the Elements on the Periodic Table.

Electricity flows through the Path of Least Resistence. In "Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy," it talks about the Planet being a huge Super Computer, which is really true. The Limestone in the rock acts like a dampening field. When that Electromagnetic Field courses through the matter or those layers, it activates like a "Sedimentary Circuitboard."

If you pay attention to the energy output that the iron core has been generating by spinning for billions of years, you have to ask yourself where all that energy has been going. If nothing's being done with it, why isn't the entire Solar System saturated with with that electrical output?

You can theorize that it's being used to maintain the consciousness of the Planet. In "Mission Impossible 3," Tom Cruise borse his guests by talking about how the Roadway System is like a Living Organism. Technically, the Highways and Freeways on the Planet are the physical Neural Pathways.

If you look closely at the English Language and the Number System, it's set up like an Algebra Equation. There's at least one finite answer where if you plug in Variables to define what those 26 Letters mean as Symbolis in conjunction with the Number System, that it would unlock.

I've said that the thing which will really throw Religious people off is when they discover that the Biblical Names are actually Acronyms for a Software Program.

Jesus Christ, as a Software Program, would qualify as a Corporation with a Fictitious Business Name. All you need is a Male Virgin Mary to solve the Immaculate Conception Riddle. Any female claiming to be the Virgin Mother would be called a liar.

However, if it's a Male Virgin Mary claiming that God "impregnated him with thought" so that he "gave birth to the idea" of Jesus Christ as a Fictitious Business Name and Corporation, it would fit that Religious Prophecy.

If a Creator does indeed exist, you'd have to assume that the Creator already knew about the Internet, UPC Bar Codes, Computers, iPods, Fictitious Business Names, and the 14th Amendment.

Each human being has a distinctive brainwave pattern that you can use a way of separating them from the other 7 Billion people on the Planet.

When coupled with Carl Jung's Theory of the Collective Unconscious and people as Planet-Sized Brain Cells that's how you'd get the "Consciousness of God" or Consciousness of the Planet functioning on the same principles as the way your millions of brain cells create your Consciousness as a Human Being.

Answer 6

GodDoes Exist!
PHYSICS professor Ulrich J. Becker, of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, stated when commenting on the existence of God: "How can I exist without a creator? I am not aware of any compelling answer ever given."
Did this contradict his scientific views? The professor's thought-provoking answer was, "If you discovered how one wheel in the 'clock' turns—you may speculate how the rest move, but you are not entitled to call this scientific and better leave alone the question of who wound up the spring."
Contrary to the opinion of some, many respected men of science do not rule out the idea of there being a God—a Great Mastermind behind the creation of the universe and man.
Consider two more examples on this point. When mathematics professor John E. Fornaess, of Princeton University, was asked for his thoughts on the existence of God, he replied: "I believe that there is a God and that God brings structure to the universe on all levels from elementary particles to living beings to superclusters of galaxies."
Physics professor Henry Margenau, of Yale University, said that he was convinced that the laws of nature were created by God, adding: "God created the universe out of nothing in an act which also brought time into existence." He then noted that in the book The Mystery of Life's Origin, three scientists explain that a Creator is a plausible explanation for life's origin. Supporting this view, astronomer Fred Hoyle has stated that believing the first cell originated by chance is like believing that a tornado ripping through a junkyard full of Boeing 747 airplane parts dismembered and in disarray could produce a 747.
To these answers can be added the words of the Bible writer Paul: "[God's] invisible qualities are clearly seen from the world's creation onward, because they are perceived by the things made, even his eternal power and Godship.

Answer 7

Let me ask you this.....when did embryology come about??? This century....what if I told you the Quran explains the development of an embryo to the fetal stage, perfectly...there are many scientific facts in the Quran that are still being discovered today. So if Mohammed (Peace be upon him) was a liar and combined Christianity and Judaism together than I ask you this.... How could an illiterate man know this over 1400 years ago?

How about you look at creation and God will show you his existence in everything he has created. GOD IS GREAT! The smell of rain in the air, the cry of a baby, the milk in a mothers breasts the stars and the cosmos, the sun and how it chases the moon.

Wake up, there is proof all around you.

Answer 8

Just look around. Everything that is studied, especially sciences concerning the Universe and its origin leaves to a dead end when scientists must give up and say that there is a bigger picture to what we realize and see. For example, science can study the Big Bang Theory till it is law but there will always be the question asked "Where did the gases that formed the Bang come from". Back to looking around in the Earth today, everything is done in mathematics, which is also a science. God is the Great Scientist and the Creator of us all...

Answer 9

There is no true scientific evidence proving this.

Any science presented from a theological standpoint on this topic has not held up to the testing required for it to be accepted.

People will claim that it passed review, and it may have. The trick is, it didn't pass review of the scientific community, only other theological scientists.

True science (meaning science done without the bias of faith), has yet to provide even one shred of evidence pertaining to god.

Answer 10

Science cannot prove or disprove the existence of God. To the scientist, faith is insufficient as it does not provide evidence that he/she is willing to accept. However to the believer, science is lacking because it is only able to gather evidence based on observations. With our ability to observe being so extremely limited, science is also very limited. For example, most scientist are familiar with the various laws of physics, but they don't know how or why these laws exist. Why do things work that way.

So both are lacking proof. Both require faith.

Answer 11

Collins, a pioneering medical geneticist who once headed the Human Genome Project, adapts his title from President Clinton's remarks announcing completion of the first phase of the project in 2000: "Today we are learning the language in which God created life." Collins explains that as a Christian believer, "the experience of sequencing the human genome, and uncovering this most remarkable of all texts, was both a stunning scientific achievement and an occasion of worship." This marvelous book combines a personal account of Collins's faith and experiences as a genetics researcher with discussions of more general topics of science and spirituality, especially centering around evolution. Following the lead of C.S. Lewis, whose Mere Christianity was influential in Collins's conversion from atheism, the book argues that belief in a transcendent, personal God—and even the possibility of an occasional miracle—can and should coexist with a scientific picture of the world that includes evolution. Addressing in turn fellow scientists and fellow believers, Collins insists that "science is not threatened by God; it is enhanced" and "God is most certainly not threatened by science; He made it all possible." Collins's credibility as a scientist and his sincerity as a believer make for an engaging combination, especially for those who, like him, resist being forced to choose between science and God.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_Collins