would you prefer to ddate someone "unaltered" for lack of a better word, or someone who's had all kinds of sh*t done to their face and body?
natural like ANGELINA JOLIE, SCARLETT JOHANSON
altered like PAM ANDERSON
2006-08-04 18:27:29 · 22 answers · asked by dragonfly 3 in Family & Relationships ➔ Singles & Dating
have you ever seen any pics of angelina as a little girl? those are real
2006-08-04 18:32:11 · update #1
what the hell is a "moot" point?
2006-08-04 18:35:41 · update #2
I love ANGELINA JOLIE :) Absolutely most beautiful outside as in women....She is the definition of pure beauty ;)
2006-08-04 18:31:11 · answer #1 · answered by UlickNme 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Shouldnt matter. I think for the most part, women have their body "altered" for their own self confidence. If it makes a woman feel better, then she should do it, as long as it isnt way out of control eg that lady that has had over 50 sugeries, and isnt even 30 yet! (by the way, she looks like shes over 50 years old!)
As long as the woman is confident in how they look, then that is the improtant thing. If her self image is that important to her, great. However, we also must remember that the saying is true, beuaty is on the inside.
I'm sure we've all heard the question, would you rather date a good looking woman who is a w(b)itch or an average looking woman who has a great personality, and is fun to be around?
The women you have mentioned are all very good looking attractive people. In reality, a man is usually very nervous, and would often not even approach a woman that good looking, as he believe she is "out of his league" per se.
2006-08-05 01:35:56 · answer #2 · answered by ? 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Angelina Jolie has had plastic surgery on her nose, so...try again. How about "natural-looking" as a better description?
In any case, everyone has different taste, so it's a moot point.
2006-08-05 01:33:09 · answer #3 · answered by Fridaberg 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Personally I would prefer somebody who is unaltered. But If I met the person and didn't know they were altered and they were a friend of mine and told me that they had stuff done to their face I would be in shock but that wouldn't change me for liking them.
How ever if I had a friend who was wanting stuff done to their face because of something not needed (Deviated septum, sever scars from a trauma or the like) I would try and discourage that.
Thats just one guys opinion
2006-08-05 01:33:41 · answer #4 · answered by jamiesonparker 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Angelina Jolie is altered... Those puff lips are not natural. I would like a girl to be very natural. Real is better than fake anyday.
2006-08-05 01:31:07 · answer #5 · answered by trigunmarksman 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Natural for be. By the way Angelina Jolie sucks, I think she is ugly.
2006-08-05 01:35:24 · answer #6 · answered by ash_m_79 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
speaking for myself it really is what the person is on the inside if getting a few alteration make you feel better then that must be sure that it is right. Now going over board like MJ is carrying too far. I would not want anyone to have anything done just for me for what kind of physical traits that I like....
2006-08-05 01:40:41 · answer #7 · answered by harrellberryhill 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends. A nose job or belly tuck is little different to having your teeth fixed, thats not natural either.
I would draw the line at implants of silicon for long term relationships, could harm a baby.
Short term it just doesnt make any difference.
2006-08-05 01:33:01 · answer #8 · answered by vaivagabundo 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
uhm i go for the first choice,either way they like u couse ur hot!.teach the guy some words or send him back to school a dumb head like him doesnt deserve someone speacial like u.,ur prettier than all of the celeberties,trust me i have no clue whats a "moot"point either but im not stupid,lol
2006-08-05 01:37:34 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Natural is much better. Pam Anderson is just plain gross looking.
2006-08-05 01:31:34 · answer #10 · answered by shominyyuspa 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋