English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

tell me which sounds better to you

1) Wipe off 2 billion Muslims and nuke their 56 nations.( i think we have more than 260 reactors so it aint hard)

2)Give the control of Israel back to Palestinians, pull off troops from Afghanistan and Iraq and favour muslims in kashmir and other disputed territories...!

1 or 2?

2006-08-04 18:09:21 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

21 answers

3) we could spend our time developing a smart pill,

2006-08-04 18:15:46 · answer #1 · answered by Hannah's Grandpa 7 · 5 0

1 and 2 also cannot work.

2006-08-04 18:13:45 · answer #2 · answered by Bright 6 · 0 0

2)Give the control of Israel back to Palestinians, pull off troops from Afghanistan and Iraq and favour muslims in kashmir and others.

i'm a muslim..i tell you, becareful with your question here.

2006-08-04 18:13:48 · answer #3 · answered by James Bond 5 · 0 0

The problem is not the people, their dignity, their culture, their resources. The problem of world peace is occuring only due to extremism. Since most of the muslims are extremists and are not following all code of conducts of a right Muslaman problem has been raising. Before 1400 years they were not at all Muslims, they were converted to muslims after Prophet Nabi. If they lose extremism as like the christian, hindus, parcis, jews, chinese, budhies etc., the world is peaceful place to live. Until then we have to fight terrorism and cross border terrorism. Other religions arespecting other people values except muslims, which contradict to the preaches of Allah. Insha Allah, I pray for peace, I pray Allah to relax the extremism, I pray Allah to delete Jihadhi from his doccument. I want to live peacefully without fear I want to travel without fear, I want to eat witout fear; which are all the basic things provided by UN Mission and Objectives and are violated by the terrorists following that religion.

2006-08-04 18:30:35 · answer #4 · answered by Next Stage of Democracy 1 · 0 0

Are you a 10 year old boy?? because I don't know anyone else who thinks a good solution to any problem is to simply kill 2 billion people, most of them innocents, based on their religion. And our troops are needed where they are. So, neither 1 or 2.

2006-08-04 18:15:40 · answer #5 · answered by sparrowhawk13147 2 · 0 0

You are an ignorant *ssh*le. For you to think that wiping out a group of people will bring peace to anyone makes me sick. The idea that you think that nuclear weapons are at all a good idea shows what a dumb*ss you are. You seem to think that muslims are especially violent but they are the same as every other group, with some people to give them all a bad name.

2006-08-04 18:14:51 · answer #6 · answered by Naomi P 4 · 0 0

give the 2 prisoner back do you have any ideal on how powerful
Israel is they could take over the whole country in fact the whole middle east if that is what they wanted to do Israel is like china china could take over this whole world right know if they wanted to they are the most power country in the world and they have the man power and the technology to do it and if you read the bible
that how this world is suppose to end is when we go to war with china.

2006-08-04 18:18:47 · answer #7 · answered by little ace 4 · 0 0

Num. 2 is a better choice. Killing 2/3 of the earth population can't be the correct answer.

2006-08-04 18:25:19 · answer #8 · answered by Lost. at. Sea. 7 · 0 0

To answer this question...

Neither one nor two would work. Some one else tried to create "Peace," his name was HITLER!!!!! There will never be peace in the world until the next world war and everyone fires off their nukes killing everyone in the world. Then it will be so peaceful... cause NO ONE WILL BE THERE!!!

There will never be peace cause Jewish people hate arabs... muslims hate everyone that isn't muslim... basically everyone hates everyone else... THATS WHY THERE WILL NEVER BE PEACE!!!

2006-08-04 18:18:36 · answer #9 · answered by roughridertecmo 2 · 0 0

Neither would work... if you choose 1 there would be people who would cry and whine about it and start a revolt and start war over that... if you choose 2 then there would never be peace.

2006-08-04 18:14:05 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

2) will not work. They will keep attacking whatever non-muslim country that borders them.

1) is not acceptable in modern society, so we'll just have to play whack-a-mole using conventional weapons.

2006-08-04 18:11:43 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers