2006-08-04 17:41:12 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Because there is no draft?
They're women?
What is wrong with you?
We're looking for people who are intelligent and like to discuss politics, current events, sports, and gaming. Please sign up for our message board, we need you!
http://phpbbstar.com/wwwhistorykamik.html
2006-08-04 17:45:37 · answer #1 · answered by bobthebuilder892001 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He's HOLDING OFF till Bill Clinton tosses Chelsea Clinton into the service. This may take some time since last time they checked Chelsea was pursuing the same Military Path her Father did That being RUNNING to CANADA to Piss and Moan. Keep watching the News and see when Chelsea returns for her tour of Duty. Right after that the Bush twins will be signing up.
2006-08-05 00:51:01 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Two things.
1) No-one is allowed to throw their children into military service. It is done by choice and free will, and when people are old enough to make their own decisions.
2) It is an act of congress that the children of a sitting president cannot serve in a war zone.
2006-08-05 09:43:22 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He's hoping his daughters will follow in his own fine military tradition, you know, let someone else go and fight! george w bush is a coward!
For the brain dead neocons who say things like,
"Yeah...just like a few other posters here said, they'll be in line right behind Chelsea Clinton and Amy Carter."
NEWSFLASH>>> President Clinton & President Carter didn't start this war! I just love tripping up republicans with the facts. After all Facts are like Kryptonite to republicans.
2006-08-05 02:01:58 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
President Bush was a military fighter jet pilot serving honorably and risking his life on flight missions. His daughters are grown women who make their own decisions. A parent can't force anyone over 18 to do anything.
2006-08-05 02:02:00 · answer #5 · answered by Richard B 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are you kidding a member of the Bush family get their hands dirty...ya right. And besides that means the twins would have to be sober for long periods of time and that's not going to happen, there a chip off the old block.
2006-08-05 00:50:08 · answer #6 · answered by The Prez. 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The President's girls have the same rights as any other American, and if they don't want to join the Military, they don't have to. You want to be forced to join the Military, or have your loved ones forced to join? His daughter's have no say in what their dad does, and his decisions for this country aren't their fault or responsibility.
2006-08-05 01:27:06 · answer #7 · answered by Naples_6 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah...just like a few other posters here said, they'll be in line right behind Chelsea Clinton and Amy Carter.
2006-08-05 02:37:59 · answer #8 · answered by machine_head_327 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What a great question....or, for that matter, any child of a U S Senator, or maybe even (I don't know if this is accurate) a child of a member of the House. I'll bet none of them is in harms way.
2006-08-05 00:47:13 · answer #9 · answered by homerunhitter 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
because his daughters already have a bad enough reputation as it is. If they joined the military, alcoholism; check, sharing alcohol with minors-check; orgies galore-check; dui(s)-check; lesbianism-check. They'd prolly retire with the military cuz they could get away with whatever they wante...oh yea, they already do, never mind.
2006-08-05 01:08:16 · answer #10 · answered by PinkBrain 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because the Bush twins don't want to die for oil or their father for that matter. Also because he can not force them to. But if the draft was instated then many males would be forced to. I find it hard to believe that we try to impeach a president for infidelity but praise one who sends our loved ones to be killed for oil and for G.W to be able to have a one up on his father. (ie, catching Saddam)
2006-08-05 02:18:21 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋