also the same scientists who helped discover vaccines, antibiotics, and other medical knowledge of the 19th century. Excluding ofcourse Darwin. So if you are against this science, then why do you take antibiotics and other medicine and procedures. To all those people disputing antibiotics as evolutionary. In fact it is, as POPULATIONS become resistant to antibiotics. Populations are the basis of evolution.
2006-08-04 16:28:53 · 14 answers · asked by ↓ImWithStupid ░░▒▒▓▓ 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Generations, to all you spell checking nit pickers.
2006-08-04 16:29:29 · update #1
"Evolution is a fairy tale for weak grown ups. This theory has helped nothing in the progress of science. It is useless." Quoted by (Professor Louis Bomoure,Director of National Center of Scientific Research)
dbd
2006-08-04 16:40:45 · answer #1 · answered by Pashur 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Read Isaiah 8:20. They contradict the Bible; God spoke and it was created.
Instead of considering the antibiotics as a sign of evolution, consider the possibility that our bodies are becoming weaker and thus more susceptible to viruses. Kind of like a de-evolution as a result of sin.
By the way, I don't use antibiotics, and I don't eat animal products that contain antibiotics, and I don't get sick even though the scientists say that I will.
2006-08-04 23:46:19 · answer #2 · answered by Marty 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Silly man. Are you saying scientist never made major goofs? While science has made great strides in technology and medicine and the like - the science of evolution is not that easy to prove.
The problem is - they make assertions and pass them off as fact when it is entirely IMPOSSIBLE to conclude that evolution is the definitive last word. The only thing this evolution THEORY has in its favor is a Federal Judge who declared it fact.
The problem with this federal judge is he is taking the scientific community's word for it and making an official statement where as he (a federal judge) does not have jurisdiction - and its absolutely idiotic, foolish and stupid for some federal judge to commit to something he has not witnessed nor has absolute proof. Again - he made a judgment where the law has not granted him absolute global power to make that assertion as fact.
Kapeesh? EVEN SOME ATHEIST SCIENTISTS HAVE ADMITTED, while they do not believe in a god - they can not rule out that a God exists and that this God has been indeed behind the entire universal superstructure.
**Steps off the soapbox and walks away**
2006-08-04 23:41:52 · answer #3 · answered by Victor ious 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are making a stereotypical assumption that all Christians are against Science, which is incorrect. Most Christians aren't against Science per se, but have an issue with Darwin's theory of "evolution". Keep in mind that this is not an inffalible theory, as it does have a "missing link" involved, where assumptions are made in its place. Go research this before you make these kinds of claims.
2006-08-04 23:39:21 · answer #4 · answered by julesl68 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Technically, creationists have been able to make an arguement between microevolution (which the vaccines and whatnot are from) and macroevolution. Moreover, the arguement that "These people came up with this agree that you don't agree with, therefore you shouldn't use anything these people come up with" is a bit logically fallacious. You use what works, regardless of how it is created.
2006-08-04 23:33:52 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Here's my advice: Ask a totally idiotic question that just sounds like it makes sense but it really has no answer because it's just that dumb. Then, when these "stupid" Christian people can't provide an adequate answer, it will look like you've won some argument or battle of the wits. Oh...you've already done that. Carry on.
2006-08-04 23:38:53 · answer #6 · answered by kevinb49 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Evolution is not science. It is a worldview that people have and which they look at everything else through. Just as Christianity or Islam or Judaism are worldviews. The question is not whether science is good or bad... the question is which worldview it should be... pardon the pun... "viewed" through.
2006-08-04 23:34:23 · answer #7 · answered by The_Benster! 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well are they the same scientist who made the abomb, the recentaddition to medicine(sinsetic insolen) that kill a few 100 people, before they pulled it from the market.
(Psalm 118:9) Â It is better to take refuge in Jehovah Than to trust in nobles.
2006-08-04 23:36:45 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
unlike you and me, "anti-evolution christians" do not think logically.
They're much like those poor Lebanese who praise Hizzbullah for provoking Israel and using them as living shields
2006-08-04 23:33:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hi, Darwin's theories have absolutely nothing to back them up with.
2006-08-11 16:51:44 · answer #10 · answered by Merrilly C 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋