We haven't used a nuke in...50 years!
2006-08-04 14:52:51 · 16 answers · asked by fresh2 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
No wait...it's been 60 years!
2006-08-04 14:53:24 · update #1
Maybe just a tactical nuke reserved for kim jong ill, but nuking the whole country, that would cause too much collateral damage. Ordinary nukes are reserved for VERY special situations, and this is not one.
2006-08-04 14:57:47 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
We shouldn't nuke them. The North Korean leader does nothing more than saber rattling. Although he is a pain he is little more than a spoiled child looking for attention. When the world focuses on somewhere other than him he starts trouble. He is not worth nuking.
2006-08-04 22:14:49 · answer #2 · answered by bobcat 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!! They are good for nothing except causing fear and destruction in the world. In my point of view, we have only 2 choices: Now or Later. Later will yield many more casualties as evidenced by Iraq. If dealt with early on (i.e. 1991) it could be done with before now and the Middle east could be more peaceful. If we wait, we wilol greatly regret it. But wait a second. Not bukes. Use our hydrogen bombs which are many times stronger than nukes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
2006-08-04 22:00:58 · answer #3 · answered by generalgrievous16 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No the US is the only country to drop the bomb on a country. Granted they started the war & wouldn't accept defete. It would have draked on for a long time & would have cost more lifes. The US still hasn't heard the end of it from the left. Why open up to a new round of whinning?
2006-08-04 22:00:41 · answer #4 · answered by viablerenewables 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well, there's a few problems with that. the united nations would get mad at us because theyre a bunch of idiots and France would boycott America. Well I guess the last one isn't really a problem, because France sucks. And ignorant fools would get mad at Bush and call him all these stupid names because they're too darn ignorant to see that North Korea is a big threat.
2006-08-04 23:08:50 · answer #5 · answered by varsdebater_conservative 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Typical
2006-08-04 21:56:17 · answer #6 · answered by Ferret 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no sense letting the majority of the innocent north koreans lose their lives
what we should do is send hit teams in to take out the leadership. voila, the north koeans will be free from another tyrannical oppresor
2006-08-05 00:45:45 · answer #7 · answered by GEN Gamer 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes you could but i bet the cry baby russians would treat that like a threat and would start a problems with us.Just look at Iraq they said in the NEWS the the russian gov were helping Saddam telling him to blow up the bridges around baghad. and when they got caught red handed they were trying to defend them selves
2006-08-05 02:30:06 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think we should, after what he did to us (the USA). He deserves every little bit of it. Can you even believe what he did to us? Gosh, some people are just plain dumber than a box of rocks.
2006-08-04 21:58:42 · answer #9 · answered by Rknrobn 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I was in school in '62. If you had said goodbye to all of your friends because you thought that you were all dead, you would never say that!
2006-08-04 21:57:47 · answer #10 · answered by helixburger 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋