Look at our system of goverment, it has a "god" (Congress). Men make laws to control other men. You can only control something if you have power over it. Without God, morals do not exist. There is no right or wrong only what the stronger party dictates as right or wrong, therefore making that dominant party "god". I do not care how you twist this water-tight logic but the fact still remains that there can be no moderation without a moderator. Our own law even states that all men are created equal. By the laws of Darwinism , the strongest survive and thrive, therefore becoming the "god' of the species. So lets get to the heart of the matter , whats the advantage of saying there is no God, it automatically puts power in the next assumed dominant party(ex. Goverment) . Thats why you will never see a poor man who is an aheist. Atheism is a "rich mans" religion.
2006-08-04
10:16:01
·
15 answers
·
asked by
icyhott4urmind
1
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
The poor are the wealthy. Interesting thoughts. Are you suggesting Atheism is putting man in a powerless position?
2006-08-04 10:19:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by Angel 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I disagree. An atheist wouldn't believe in the possibility of a god, so how would politicians become deitites? Besides, they don't have control over what anyones does. Murdering other people is illegal, but people still do it. It's a choice they're still free to make. It's just the consequences people don't like. It's a persons belief of what is right and wrong that keeps them from doing the 'wrong' things. Some people get that moral fiber from religion and their belief in god, and some people grasp the concepts naturally.
But then you're not really looking for an answer are you? I also disagree with your last statement. Why can't a poor person be an atheist? Who better than someone who is down and out to have a disbelief in a god that loves everyone. If he loved a poor person, wouldn't he try to help them? Wouldn't he make sure they could buy their kids nicer clothes so they wouldn't get teased and beat up at school? Would a god let a husband beat his wife and then be cruel enough to have the authorities tell her she's lying??? Some of my friends have denounced the possibility of a god for reasons along those lines.
2006-08-04 10:44:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by larsor4 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Absolutely not! To say God is not real and to say you are a god is the farthest from the truth. I want you to read this book series because they are saying the same things we are saying: International Society for Krishna Consciousness. To order a catalog, the # is:1-800-927-4152. The website is www.harekrishna.com. I recommend "The Journey of Self Discovery". That book gave me a much better understanding of alot of things and everything was so simple.
2006-08-04 10:27:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by UVRay 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Don't talk nonsense. to say there is no god is to say there is no god.
Why you people insist on posting such utter bull with absolutely ZERO evidence to back yourselves up - come one where are the facts and figures! What? You have none? Gee...I'm shocked. I've never broken the law, never felt inclined to and I certainly don't consider my self a god. "Morals" exist just fine without the fear of hell behind them. Although I note you're indicating that it's only the fear of hell that stops you from committing a crime.
Oh...and I'm working class...
Sorry for blowing your little "theory" out of the water.
2006-08-04 10:31:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes it is all about control, we dominate each other in many ways. Either Aggressive, or passive aggressive.
And yes all my atheist friends are very rich. 1st they became atheist's and then they became rich. Why? They learned to dominate their own emotions, instead of being a slave to them.
Are you jealous? Are you a slave to your own over sensitive emotions? Do you often regret what you did or said to someone? Out of control? The need to dominate others is the easy way to feel in control, but only for a moment.
2006-08-04 10:24:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by Real Friend 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Dude - last time I checked, we elect those people (and - ahem - they are men AND women). They are to listen to the voice of the people; these representatives do not "control" us.
Demos-kratia: demos = people and kratia = power: power to the people. Don't they teach American government or civics classes anymore?
Your claim of "Without God, morals do not exist" is invalid, and there are numerous posts to show where morals and ethics have been and are developed outside of religion. My favorite: Socrates.
So much for "water tight" logic.
*ramble, ramble*
2006-08-04 10:20:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Meh... "i've got been cruising this planet for over 60 years. IF God existed he could understand what form of information could convince me of his life… if he needed me to comprehend it ;) so a techniques? not something; nada; zilch." i assume HE the two does not care approximately ME in any way in any recognize… OR God is imaginary... i bypass with the latter. I’m one hundred% specific god is imaginary. If he particularly existed he could have got here upon the thank you to cajole me he exists. needless to say he hasn't cos in basic terms as needless to say he does not. in case you needed to cajole somebody you existed, to what lengths could you bypass? could you drop some heavily ambiguous ‘clues’... OR, introduce your self. heavily – this has scam written throughout it. And-Or fake you have been some place and you have been invisible – enable’s say 50% of the inhabitants “knew” and “enjoyed” you – enable’s say you needed the different 50% of the inhabitants to “understand” and “love” you too… cos you rather do love all of them soooo unconditionally… What lengths could you bypass to cajole them? heavily – this has Büllshït written throughout it. And-OR “in case you have "important" information helping your god, lay it out - yet word that the way you experience once you look at doggies or sunsets, or conversations you had with your self, or your lack of ability to describe some thing any different way do not symbolize information.” “understand that: desires at the instant are not information. Wishful questioning isn't information. Logical fallacies at the instant are not information. very own revelation isn't information. Illogical conclusions at the instant are not information. Disproved statements at the instant are not information. Unsubstantiated claims at the instant are not information. Hallucinations/delusions at the instant are not information. concepts this is ambiguous isn't information. The Universe does not care what you have self assurance in. information that calls for a definite perception isn't information. concepts that cannot be confirmed isn't information. concepts that cannot be falsified isn't information. Experiments with inconclusive outcomes at the instant are not information. concepts this is barely knowable by ability of a privileged few isn't information. Experiments which at the instant are not and can't be duplicated by ability of others at the instant are not information. the dazzling thing approximately technology is that it does not ask on your faith, in basic terms your eyes.” ~
2016-11-03 21:50:53
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Who gave you the authority to judge other men? isn't that your god's job? By denouncing athiests as morally inferior, aren't you making yourself superior and proclaiming yourself to be a god over them? You're doing exactly what you're admonishing by posting this question.
2006-08-04 10:21:59
·
answer #8
·
answered by Yu_pimp 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
According to your question, if i say God is not real , i make myself a god, which mean i am not real either. Then you say rich man are atheists. So, i am not real and i am very rich. Therefore, i certainly must be YOUR IMAGINATION !!!!
2006-08-04 10:26:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by Gersin 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Religion are made to enslave us, to keep us away frow knowledge ( power ) , like Congress
But I really think moral can exist withou religion,
2006-08-04 10:21:34
·
answer #10
·
answered by The Patriot 4
·
0⤊
0⤋