Throwing science out the window, we look like apes!
2006-08-04 10:19:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by tonymrep 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
The chromosomes are not what make a human, it is the DNA, which we have similar DNA to apes, not pigs. Pigs may have the same a's and b's, but they are not connected in the same order that ours and apes are. Now, asking why we didn't evolve from pigs is about the same as asking why you were born into that body and that family. There is no realy reason except that that is the way it was done.
2006-08-04 10:19:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by Wookie on Water 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You truly are clueless. You would never even get it I know, too simple minded, but if you ever managed the brains to notice...we aren't that much different then other primates. Other animals we are very little alike, but other primates very much so. Even simply our hands, they are the only other creatures that we share the same kind of hands. If we were in no way connected to them at all then I'm sure it would not be that way.
Pig people with human heads...are you that much of an idiot? Get off the drugs. Other animals can not evolve into us, we are our own species that evolved into us.
Well supposedly they say humans taste like pork (they must have ask cannibals?), so then I guess you probably taste just like your piggish attitude! BTW your religion is just a THEORY too, and even a lesser one that is based only on belief in stories you were told.
"that always makes people mad when i say that " hehehe Well don't you just have your own little joke to giggle over. What are you, 12? I really don't give a damn if you say that, you're just as annoying with or without it.
2006-08-04 10:27:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by Indigo 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't normally take this tone, but... are you REALLY this ignorant?
Nobody, least of all Darwin, EVER said we evolved from apes. That is NOT what evolution teaches...not even close. But it IS what fundamentalist ministers SAY evolution teaches. Yeah, like they would know!
Also, go learn the meaning of the word "theory" in scientific context, huh? It does NOT have the same meaning as in day-to-day speaking. Did you really not know this??? Yes, evolution is a theory...a scientific theory...not a hypothesis, not a wild guess. Read up on this for a few years and you'll see that the DNA trends also make perfect evolutionary sense.
Oh lord! What's happening in our schools?
2006-08-04 10:24:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by stevenB 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Evolution is a theory with more scientificly grounded evidence than all other religous creationist stories combined.
DNA is made up of just 4 different types of building blocks, that can be arranged millions of ways. Just like Lego's. You have no idea how dumb you sound when you say "Their DNA is exactly same, but different". People know evolution is a theory,and a very well grounded one. I am guessing people get mad when you make retarted statements (like the one you made here) which show you really don't know what you are talking about.
2006-08-04 10:20:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by cognitively_dislocated 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
It doesn't make me mad when you say that evolution is a theory -- it just makes me think that you don't understand what it means when something is a theory.
For example, evolution is a theory the same way that gravity is. We understand that gravity exists and we hav some theoretical models of gravity. Newton's model was that large objucts like the earth attract us to them. Einstein's theory is more like large opbjects like the earth are pushing against us keeping us from going through. Both theories explain a lot. We now think that Einstein is closer to the truth. We don't believe that either is perfect.
But we know that there is gravity.
As for evolution, we know that we have evolved through time and we understand some of the mechanisms that have allowed us to do this (genetic mutations and natural selections). There are theoretical models of evolution that give us a partial explanation -- but as with Newton and Einstein, we don't believe that they are perfect models.
But we know that we have evolved.
I'm not mad that you think it is a theory. I'm sad for you that you don't understand truth when you see it.
2006-08-04 10:23:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by Ranto 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Evolution is a theory. Gravity is also a theory. I wouldn't suggest you test the latter by walking out a third-story window.
Both are supported by scientific evidence.
Pigs are not primates. Nor are eagles. Apes are. Thus when looking at a scientific examination of the evidence of Evolution, you would look at other primates vs. more unrelated species.
We have a lot in common with the banana genetically, also - I'm surprised you didn't bring this into your "agruments" as well.
2006-08-04 10:20:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
One day a bipedal pig species might evolve. It wouldn't be human, because homosapien sapien is the identity of the bipedal species which evolved from an ape ancestor.
Also, it is apparent from your post that you think humans are the zenith of evolution and that all life is aiming to evolve into humans. The theory of evolution however says no such thing, thereby proving your true ignorance of the theory.
2006-08-04 10:27:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm sure it's hard to grasp the concept of evolution, being so absolutely ignorant and full of themeselves, as is evident by your name, pretty one.
Look very closely;
The worldwide scientific research community from over the past 140 years has discovered that no known hypothesis other than universal common descent can account scientifically for the unity, diversity, and patterns of terrestrial life. This hypothesis has been verified and corroborated so extensively that it is currently accepted as fact by the overwhelming majority of professional researchers in the biological and geological sciences (AAAS 1990; NAS 2003; NCSE 2003; Working Group 2001). No alternate explanations compete scientifically with common descent, primarily for four main reasons: (1) so many of the predictions of common descent have been confirmed from independent areas of science, (2) no significant contradictory evidence has yet been found, (3) competing possibilities have been contradicted by enormous amounts of scientific data, and (4) many other explanations are untestable, though they may be trivially consistent with biological data.
Accepted as Fact. Sorry you can't see that.
2006-08-04 10:22:47
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Saying that evolution is a theory doesn't make me mad, it makes me sad for you.
Evolution is a natural function. The Theory of Evolution attempts to explain how that function occurs. In the same way, gravity is a natural function. The Theory of Gravity attempts to explain how that function occurs.
Even if you don't want to believe in evolutionary theory, you might want to read up on the scientific method. It will help you understand what scientists are talking about, and, if nothing else, improve your arguments.
2006-08-04 10:22:24
·
answer #10
·
answered by marbledog 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
you won't understand this yet many researchers have contributed already to thought of evolution. that's extensively customary by using the scientific community with the aid of fact that's verifiable and repeatable - independently. explanation why we attempt drugs on animals is with the help of the belief of evolution. one million. whilst we grew to become self-conscious and able to bypass guidance with the aid of generations. 2. to proceed to exist. 3. there exchange into no lively motivation to alter into some thing else. We adapt to proceed to exist. 4. the place did they get their thought from? If a place is risky, you progression or create some thing to offer your self with protection. that's user-friendly instincts. 5. Why could they? what's the earnings? Termites have created habitats that makes use of passive cooling... bats have a type of altruism... why is it that we those animals exchange into like us? that's like asking, why do no longer people evolve the flexibility to be certain greater of the electromagnetic spectrum like birds... 6. you have particularly an thought concerning to the mind of animals huh? 7. Apes are rather particularly smart. They hire equipment and what no longer. Why do you preserve insisting that evolution's end purpose is to be nearer to human beings??? Evolution could no longer care much less approximately us.. that's a non-smart tension that creates variety. 8. that's a commerce off. that's why we stepped forward the family members shape of two human beings - one to guard the toddler and the different to guard the carer. Tigers could have greater effectual claws yet we are able to make sharper equipment. 9. sure. Ring species includes recommendations.
2016-10-01 11:48:17
·
answer #11
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋