Top generals see threat of Iraq civil war By Kristin Roberts and Vicki Allen
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Iraq is caught in the worst sectarian violence yet seen and faces the threat of civil war, two of the United States' senior generals said on Thursday, three years after the U.S. invasion.
"Sectarian violence probably is as bad as I've seen it, the senior Generals stated. Rumsfelt and Bush did not tell the truth about Iraq and another General said this about his boss Rumsfelt.." Rumsfelt always put on a happy face about the war and he refused to admit the war was going badly". Now troops are dying for nothing and the warmongers don't want to admit that. The warmongers and Bush supporters should be ashamed. Do all of you here on this board agree? And today more American troops were killed for nothing. The USA will soon eat crow and suck shame.
2006-08-04 08:16:53 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
I don't know about the sucking and the crow. I think they thought that by going in there that they would bring peace to the middle east. That is just not possible.
Yes, i believe they should leave Iraq alone. Pull out and go home.
Stay out of the middle east. They won't though this isn't about making Iraq a safe place to live. this is about secureing our oil supply for years to come. This is about the oil.
They won't leave until they know that there oil supply is secure.
2006-08-04 08:23:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Troll, how can we lose some thing that's not even over yet? The preliminary invasion grew to become right into a re-sounding crushing defeat for the Iraqi militia or maybe the occupation has been a fulfillment on the tactical point and it remains occurring, the only criticism is that it has long gone on see you later yet while everyone ON those POLITICAL POSTS could worry TO examine A e book THAT grew to become into not WRITTEN by ability of a few LEFTY fool they could understand that inspite of it occurring see you later it is now common for it to final factor long because of fact the common length of any insurgency is approximately 10 years. you could say we screwed up plenty in the aftermath of the invasion and Rummy,Bremer and finally Bush are those accountable regardless of if it is plenty from over and going our way precise now. end being a troll and ask in basic terms one honest question quite of growing to be statements each and all of the time.
2016-11-03 21:40:52 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dems want the American people to believe that. It's not true, we're rebuilding a country and that isn't going to happen overnight. Dems are just a bunch of whiny marshmallow people, who want us to throw down our guns and surrender to France. This is WAR, remember 9/11? We're still fighting it. But the Dems want to believe it's over and we'll never be attacked again. But the truth is we've been kicking butt and catching the people before they can launch another attack on the USA. God Bless America. The Home of the Brave!!!
2006-08-04 08:28:34 · answer #3 · answered by jjcane64 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, the Iraqi President even stated that Iraq would be able to operate by itself by the end of the Year.
2006-08-04 08:23:54 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
MY GAWD...
This cant be a surprise to anyone.
Those people have been fighting for decades and putting the US military in the middle of them was not going to stop them
Saddam Husein was the only one ,who was brutal enough to keep the peace between them.
Bush thought they would throw roses at our feet..He should be impeached and run out of office.
Surprise...?? I think not
2006-08-04 08:26:11 · answer #5 · answered by sam s 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, it is a possibility. "Propanganda?', it's from the generals' own mouths. Things are not going well over there no matter what you think.
However, if we leave we will certainly "lose the war" because civil war would be a virtual certainty.
Difficult, difficult times.
2006-08-04 08:25:18 · answer #6 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The US has been losing in Iraq and anywhere else in the middle east since they got there
2006-08-04 12:54:18 · answer #7 · answered by HHH 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Driving around Ft. Dix looking for a skinny little Punk waving a protest flag. MMMMM Don't see that little punk. CHICKEN!!!
2006-08-04 08:23:03 · answer #8 · answered by Boredstiff 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
all those troops who died in iraq, died for nothing(or may be died for bush). cuz he didnt have to send them to iraq in the first place.
was saddam involved in 911? did he attack US? NO! so basically there was no reason for troops to be sent there.
2006-08-04 08:23:24 · answer #9 · answered by saba 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
LOL You are such an ***! and who is this Rums"felt" person you supposedly quoted about. If you are gonna lie at least spell correctly.
2006-08-04 08:38:45 · answer #10 · answered by Stand 4 somthing Please! 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋