So everyone's answer to The Bible is "prove it", "Science says otherwise", etc. etc. But when the media says "Bush is bad" everyone says "Yeah" with no facts, or even research, or even looking at both sides. But with The Bible, people say "Yeah right", "It's false" "Prove it" etc, etc. But here's an interesting predicament, if you need proof of The Bible, (which negates the premise of faith, by the way), and did any actual research, and not just research on the net, but actual book, library, contact-the-scientist research, you would find out something. The Bible has matched ALL archealogical finds that they've looked for when science has tried a multitude of times to DISPROVED God. So, then, with that being said, how can you still say "Prove it" or "it's a lie"?
2006-08-04 06:23:21 · 12 answers · asked by I Lost My Mind Truckin' 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
You have LIBERALS, many are Kenites.
A LIBERAL hates God, to them there is no right or wrong. all are in some was both good and bad.
There is no truth, no sin, and if everyone would only see that there would be no war.
It is the fault of the Rich, or Jews, or Bush!
and for American LIBs its our fault we are guilty for the ills of the world, we should be punished.
They are working to make the US a third world country to make up for our sins against man, everyone is better than us.
Just lesson to them, and you will know them.
2006-08-04 06:43:54 · answer #1 · answered by Grandreal 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Bible is taught and made to believe as true, since the childhood of human beings. Whereas Science is experimented for its truth or otherwise. Therefore the Science has more weightage. May be that is the reason that need is felt to authenticate truth of Bible (or any other religious book) with the support of Science. Lies or No lies in the media are believed by the people as these are enforced upon them by repeating it again and again and again... Some one said,"Talk a lie so many time that the people start believing it as Truth".
2006-08-04 06:46:02 · answer #2 · answered by jikg 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I've done some research and have found that even if 'grains of truth' can be found, it hardly supports the whole story. I.E.-Noah's Ark-According to some satellite pix what is thought to be pieces of a boat/ark can be seen but it has not been proven-a lot of skeptics want a little more proof that we're not looking at geological formations and archeology has shown no evidence of a world-wide flood. That is just one example of a hundred. Philosophically, it doesn't even make sense...a singular deity 'creating'; where is evidence or scientific proof of that?...Oh, wat! Can't frogs change gender if the population can't support reproduction? Even then, there have to be females so the whole concept of a singular male deity can not be proven by any standards we have.
I'm not a scientist, but common sense tells me that you shouldn't rush into a war when you're allies are slim and a huge part of your own country isn't behind you.
Btw, assuming you're not a scientist either, if you want a more partial outlook, try looking at both sides instead of convincing yourself you're a victim
2006-08-04 06:56:54 · answer #3 · answered by strpenta 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You obvioulsy haven't done the research you admonish others for failing to perform, because what you're saying is nothing but blatantly false Christian propoganda.
Look, I don't need to study archaeology to know snakes and donkeys don't talk, people don't rise from the dead or walk on water, and zombies never walked the streets of Jerusalem "seen by many". Even if every spec of verifiable history in the Bible were true, that doesn't in the least imply that other crap is true.
2006-08-04 06:31:57 · answer #4 · answered by lenny 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's a matter of what sources they believe are reliable (and it's probably not fair to make that generalization about ALL of them BTW)
I learned when I was six to observed the news with some skeptisism. This guy tried to kidnap me, anyway, because of some other events, it turned out to be a big news story. Yeah - I saw it reported 20 different ways: my age ranged from 5 to 9, I went through 5 different doors of a 2 door car, I could go on and on.
2006-08-04 06:34:15 · answer #5 · answered by daisyk 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you only have to listen to bush to realize he is an idiot, just as you only have to read the bible to know it is bs
i never believe something unless i have info from both sides and took the time to think it out for myself
it is not possible to disprove the existence of anything. the burden is on he who proposes the positive, i.e. that something does exist.. science knows that
you are right in that many people do believe anything someone tells them, especially if it comes from a person of power - president, researcher, parents, minister, priest, etc.
2006-08-04 06:32:29 · answer #6 · answered by Phoenix, Wise Guru 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your analogy is inappropriate.
The bible is more accurately compared to a Superman comic book or fiction novel than a newspaper.
There is no credible evidence that supports the bible myths. Your conclusions are also incorrect.
2006-08-04 06:35:20 · answer #7 · answered by Left the building 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm not sure where the question ends and the rant begins. What does proving the bible have to do with "Bush is bad?"
2006-08-04 06:30:10 · answer #8 · answered by Privratnik 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Great question and when the ark of the covenant is located under what used to be Babylon I believe a few so called smart folks will need to rethink
2006-08-04 06:30:45 · answer #9 · answered by Ron K 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, you claim they've proved it, but I don't see any links or anything. So how are you going to prove that they proved it?
And I know Bush is bad because I do not agree with his political agenda. But that's just me.
2006-08-04 06:29:42 · answer #10 · answered by Girl Wonder 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋