2006-08-04 03:02:19 · 9 answers · asked by Rayview 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Civic Participation
No and neither do they, that's where the problem lies.They have been fighting for centuries, and only the totally insane think a solution can be found. The best anyone can hope for will only be temporary. There is good and bad on both sides of this dispute and since there has never been a lasting peace anywhere in the world throughout history, what makes you think any different now? It's a sorry thing and I feel for the victims on both sides but a lasting solution...never happen.
2006-08-04 03:12:22 · answer #1 · answered by Bob D 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We can blow away entire nations, without Nuclear weapons, we have MOABs. 22,000lb conventional smart bombs with nuke blast power but NO radiation.
M…..Mother
O…..of
A…..all
B…..bombs
WE have Tomahawks with fuel-air explosive war heads. The big Tomahawks can carry 10 war heads. They can burn entire cities with fuel-air explosive.
First the MOAB, when the shock wave clears, in comes the Tomahawk. The entire city is flattened and then burned with fuel-air explosive. The fuel-air explosive burns everything left and it burns off all the oxygen. There is no way to survive!
With our satellites we can target every Arab city in any terrorist nation, and then lock them all into a firing solution. Then at 3am any morning the order was given, every Arab city targeted could be blown clean off the face of the Earth, all at the same time.
We could land our troops 30 minutes later and own the entire nation. There wouldn’t even be anyone left to shoot at our soldiers. The only thing that would be left are giant smoking holes in the sand. Maybe then the other nations would say “ What ever you do don’t piss off the Americans! They can blow away our whole nation with the push of a button, just like they did to those stupid Arabs!” Maybe being “ Dust in the Wind” would stop all stupid BS America bashing. At least to our face, what they to themselves behind our backs doesn’t matter.
2006-08-04 20:09:14 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
First we come up with a much better energy source than oil.
Second we seal off the rest of the world from the Mid-east..they will fight amongst themselves being cut off from everyone else.
Then either someone will win and eventually establish peace in region and then we can try peace between world and mid-east...this is dependent on the rest of the world KEEPING THEIR NOSES OUT OF MID-EAST affairs
2006-08-04 14:05:26 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Allow 1 side to win. It takes 2 to have a conflict. If 1 is eliminated, then there is no conflict. Violence is not the only solution, but it is the ultimate solution.
2006-08-04 10:09:41 · answer #4 · answered by Aegis of Freedom 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There was no 'war in the Middle East' before the creation of Israel. Makes one think, doesn't it?
2006-08-04 10:49:07 · answer #5 · answered by Tokoloshimani 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nuke 'em
Make the area so hot radioactively that anyone entering would fry within hours. If no one can use the lands, then they won't have anything to fight over.
'Course I would also nuke Mecca and Medina and Teran at the same time and place the blame on the Australians
2006-08-04 10:41:40 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
A comprimise of land mediated by a countyr other than the UNited States because US always has israel interest primary in their goals. Both sides need to come to compromise without US involvment.
2006-08-04 10:33:00 · answer #7 · answered by omsuperhoops 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Instead of sending soldiers to fight in wars, make the leaders (presidents, prime ministers, dictators) to combat each other. Leaders are brave to fight wars because it is not their lives that are put in harms way.
2006-08-04 10:25:18 · answer #8 · answered by cherox 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Utilize every possibility to end dependence on Mideast oil, contain the entire area and let them breed themselves into extinction.
2006-08-04 10:11:20 · answer #9 · answered by iknowtruthismine 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋