2006-08-04 01:56:09 · 19 answers · asked by Adam D 2 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
Ok I'll own up as nobody seems to get it.
It's a joke:
Is 4-sight twice as good as 2nd sight.
2006-08-06 21:10:58 · update #1
Yes, because foresight is supposedly accurate whereas second sight is allegorical or symbolical and you have to try to figure out what it means, assuming it exists of course.
2006-08-04 01:58:50 · answer #1 · answered by Katrine 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
With second sight you know whats on the way, with foresight you have a reasonable guess at whats on the way.
2006-08-04 13:02:26 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
foresight, seing what'll come next, is far better than second sight, which i know nothing about.
2006-08-04 09:00:20 · answer #3 · answered by Jay Vee 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes but only half as good as hindsight
2006-08-04 09:00:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes of course. it is always better than second sight
2006-08-04 09:00:06 · answer #5 · answered by jimmyrians 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Tri Sight is best...
2006-08-04 08:59:05 · answer #6 · answered by okronbon 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no only hindsight is generally fegarded as the perfect science
2006-08-04 13:47:50 · answer #7 · answered by lefang 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The here and now in reality is the best
2006-08-04 08:58:30 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It depends but I think both are better than hindsight ~
2006-08-04 08:59:29 · answer #9 · answered by ET 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
YES - but half as good as hindsight
2006-08-04 08:59:24 · answer #10 · answered by jonnygaijin 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋