I try to get people to read rational theologians, mostly process theologians (David Ray Griffin, John Cobb, Marjorie Suchocki) or empirical theologians (Henry Nelson Wieman, Bernard Meland). And to read really scholarly Biblical criticism.
2006-08-03 15:04:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I cannot make you believe something that you don't want to believe, but I urge you to use discernment, reason and logic when thinking aobut evolution- all the things evolutionists accuse us of not using , but really- do the principles of evolution make sense? If this has taken place over the course of millions of years, little by little, then we are being decieved when we are told we are looking for "the missing link" we are looking for millions of missing links- besides that- there are so many common sense, scientific questions that evolution just cannot answer- no matter how you twist it.
If you are really interested in education and not just disproving something that does not fit your mold- read this article, it is fun reading but very informative and common sense-
Meet Gaspy: the lungfish:
http://www.reflecthisglory.org/study/did...
here are other bits of interesting fact for you to ponder :
Charles Dawson, a British lawyer and amateur geologist announced in 1912 his discovery of pieces of a human skull and an apelike jaw in a gravel pit near the town of Piltdown, England . . . Dawson's announcement stopped the scorn cold. Experts instantly declared Piltdown Man (estimated to be 300,000 to one million years old), the evolutionary find of the century. Darwin's missing link had been identified. Or so it seemed for the next 40 or so years. Then, in the early fifties . . . scientists began to suspect misattribution. In 1953, that suspicion gave way to a full-blown scandal: Piltdown Man was a hoax . . . tests proved that its skull belonged to a 600-year-old woman, and its jaw to a 500-year-old orangutan from the East Indies." Our Times--the Illustrated History of the 20th Century (Turner Publishing, 1995, page 94).
Science Fiction
The Piltdown Man fraud wasn't an isolated incident. The famed "Nebraska Man" was built from one tooth, which was later found to be the tooth of an extinct pig. "Java Man" was found in the early 20th Century, and was nothing more than a piece of skull, a fragment of a thigh bone and three molar teeth. The rest came from the deeply fertile imaginations of plaster of Paris workers. "Heidelberg Man" came from a jawbone, a large chin section and a few teeth. Most scientists reject the jawbone because it's similar to that of modem man. Still, many evolutionists believe that he's 250,000 years old. No doubt they pinpointed his birthday with good old carbon dating. Now there's reliable proof. Not according to Time magazine (June 11, 1990). They published an article in the science section that was subtitled, "Geologists show that carbon dating can be way off." Don't look to "Neanderthal Man" for any evidence of evolution. Recent genetic DNA research indicates the chromosomes do not match those of humans. They do match those of bipedal primates (apes).
What does Science Say?
Here are some wise words from a few respected men of science: "Evolution is a fairy tale for grown-ups. This theory has helped nothing in the progress of science. It is useless." (Professor Louis Bounoure, Director of Research, National Center of Scientific Research). "Evolution is unproved and unprovable." (Sir Arthur Keith--he wrote the foreword to the 100th edition of, Origin of the Species). "Scientists who go about teaching that evolution is a fact of life are great con-men, and the story they are telling may be the greatest hoax ever." (Dr. T. N. Tahmisian, Atomic Energy Commission, USA).
"To suppose that the eye . . . could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest degree." Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species
A great resource for some education that is logical and common sense is called "The Science or Evolution: expand your mind" You can get this DVD from WayoftheMaster.com
2006-08-04 02:19:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
We did not evolve from apes. We have the same ancestor. When will you people understand this?
2006-08-03 21:43:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by mathewthere 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Born again Pastafarian at heart. I spread truth, and educate. I disprove myths, and fight to keep science in science class.
2006-08-03 21:28:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
one question:
if we evolved from apes, why are there still apes?
2006-08-03 21:28:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by criegnicealaways 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
RAmen!
2006-08-03 21:29:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by Girl Wonder 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Another question:
If we were created by god, why do people still think he exists?
2006-08-03 21:30:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by The Resurrectionist 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Blessed be his meaty balls...
2006-08-03 21:29:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by JerseyRick 6
·
0⤊
0⤋