2006-08-03 13:22:54 · 12 answers · asked by raul b 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
No he could never be a hero. He is evil through and through.
2006-08-03 13:26:32 · answer #1 · answered by I love my husband 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Huh. The girl up top saying how could someone who butchered so many people be considered a hero? Look at George Bush, the selfmade hero. Look at how many he has butchered
2006-08-03 13:27:23 · answer #2 · answered by OG Don Diego 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know about "hero", but certianly more admired because it's alot harder to hit Marylin Manson with a plane than it is to hit two huge buildings.
2006-08-03 13:27:46 · answer #3 · answered by something'srotten 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Osama Bin Laden would be considered a terrorist no matter who he killed. He is a person who justifies killing people in the name of God. His concept of Jihad is terrorist in nature, so regardless of his target, I will always consider him a terrorist.
2006-08-03 13:29:53 · answer #4 · answered by A Person 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
*Just* Marilyn Manson? No, then he'd be considered a murderer, not a terrorist. Not that that's any better.
Edit: Actually if his *followers* did, he'd also probably be considered a cult leader.
2006-08-03 13:38:58 · answer #5 · answered by The Resurrectionist 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You're kiddin right? Alrighty then......I'll say..NO! How could you think anyone was a hero who killed and butchered people like this?
2006-08-03 13:26:07 · answer #6 · answered by trainer53 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
who is maralyn manson?
2006-08-03 13:25:30 · answer #7 · answered by April 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Killing is ALWAYS wrong. Even if we killed Osama, it would still be un-Christian.
2006-08-03 13:27:10 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He is a hero, just not to you
or me either come to that.
2006-08-03 13:27:52 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
probably
The difference between a terrorist and a revolutionist are that the revolutionists won
2006-08-03 13:26:23 · answer #10 · answered by billyandgaby 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋