2006-08-03 13:19:08 · 39 answers · asked by Mahfuz R 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
answer to A Person:
Did he ate pork after saying that???
2006-08-03 13:29:10 · update #1
Looks like Peter did (Acts 10:9-16)
2006-08-03 13:24:12 · answer #1 · answered by Randy G 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Probably not, but understand that it was not a cleanliness issue, but an economic one....The grains needed to make pork lucious could feed more people than the resulting meat from the slaughtered animal. And enough food in the middle east was as big a problem then as it is now. Food restrictions have historically not been because of health problems, but rather because of economic ones. Now, however, it is just a tradition, which, as a matter of fact, all but the most strict Jew, ignore.
2006-08-03 13:29:10 · answer #2 · answered by April 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No Jesus never ate pork. He actually forbade the consumption of pork, its a verse that has survived the numerous changes in the bible today. Thats why alot of Christians don't eat pork.
2006-08-03 14:02:24 · answer #3 · answered by bttrfly* 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the Bible doesn't record Jesus having ate pork but I found these verses that might help.
14 Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross;
15 And having spoiled principalities and powers, he made a shew of them openly, triumphing over them in it.
16 Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath days:
Colossians 2:14-16
2006-08-03 13:33:21 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I know that Jesus didn't eat pork, but I don't know about the apostles.
2006-08-03 13:27:27 · answer #5 · answered by Meeshell 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
with the aid of fact your question exchange into badly written, i do no longer likely comprehend what you're saying. I *think of* which you have concluded that Christians are allowed to consume pink meat. The verses from Act 10- you utilize them as information that all and sundry meats are clean. yet you do no longer contain Peter's interpretation (which, thinking he wrote area of the Bible and alter into especially chosen by using God, would be greater superb than your interpretation) which seems later. whilst the human beings hear his interpretation, they say "18When they heard this, that they had not greater objections and praised God, asserting, "So then, God has granted even the Gentiles repentance unto existence." Peter needless to say interpreted it to intend that God has granted even the Gentiles repentance unto existence. The imagery of the animals exchange into purely that-imagery. additionally, Jesus did no longer consume unclean meats. He reported he exchange into no longer right here to abolish the regulation. If he had to alter the regulations, does no longer he have reported so? it style of feels surprisingly considerable.
2016-10-01 10:59:21 · answer #6 · answered by bondieumatre 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Probably not. It would not have been clean or sanitary to eat pork back then. They did not have the cooking, cleaning or refrigeration methods we have now...thus the mosaic law and it's customs of foods served on in diferent ways on diferent plates etc.
2006-08-03 13:24:06 · answer #7 · answered by sleepless in the ATL 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Pork is expensive XD
2006-08-03 13:24:00 · answer #8 · answered by Mu3lio 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Jesus- unlikely. He never left Judea.
Apostles- maybe. I know Paul was a Jew, but he also a Roman, and Romans loved their pork!
2006-08-03 13:22:22 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
To tell you the truth, the bible did not specify if Jesus or his desciples ate pork.
2006-08-03 13:26:19 · answer #10 · answered by sistren 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋