English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i just saw a program about this on T.V...and i'm on the fence on this one. was Wayne Williams guilty of all of the murders?? or only of some of them?? or was he just a scapegoat?? please explain your answers...

2006-08-03 10:07:28 · 5 answers · asked by veevee 2 in Politics & Government Law Enforcement & Police

5 answers

That case has been reexamined multiple times, including just this year. Each opening of the investigation ends with it being closed because no new evidence can be located that does not preclude his involvement.

There is evidence linking him to evidence found on the bodies and he was observed at the scene just minutes after a body was dumped in the river.

I find myself on the fence on some issues of the case as well. While I believe Wayne Williams was involved in the murders, I have my doubts that he acted alone. Whether it was an active partner or a partner after the fact, I do believe there was more than one person involved in the murders.

2006-08-03 11:09:06 · answer #1 · answered by sarhibar 3 · 1 1

He was caught redhanded by the FBI serial crimes unit at the seen of the crime of one of the kids. There is book called: "Mind Hunter, Inside the FBI's Elite Serial Crime Unit" by John Douglas. He goes in to great depth of this case.

2006-08-03 10:16:23 · answer #2 · answered by Boredstiff 5 · 0 1

It was sad a lot of kids was kidnapped.... When they find them they turn out dead...

2017-02-10 23:08:21 · answer #3 · answered by Dominique 3 · 0 0

scapegoat. it means he was blamed but not guilty.

2006-08-03 10:11:27 · answer #4 · answered by harryt62 4 · 1 0

It's very sad.

2006-08-03 10:13:30 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers