English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I know some of you must have some thoughts and cogitations on this ...:

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=ArCS3iz0dxo.kFMBW5PSPrrsy6IX?qid=20060803053351AAmC6ts

2006-08-03 02:19:47 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

re: Well Travelled ..Qabalism ..which is "Otz Chioth'(if I had a Hebrew font I would type the Hebrew original)...dates to at least 2-300 BC..as Dead Sea Scrolls confirm that it dates as a practice to the Intertestamental period and practiced by the Essenes in the historical Epoch contemporary with Jesus... So you are entirely misinformed .. perhaps study more in your "travels" ... Hasidic and Gentile traditions have all through the Middle Ages to the present claimed that this "Tree of Life" .. dates to Torak and the Old Testament (which in fact Torah is).. I have studied Semitic languages now twenty years "Traveller" ..I assure you this is no modern "invention" ..

2006-08-03 02:34:58 · update #1

Good to see some of the "physics" disposition !

2006-08-03 02:38:01 · update #2

The z- particle got us to what (10X10 to the negative eleventh power of a second of the Big Bang's primary conditions?)...cutting edge astrophysics prior to the new "string theory" stuff regarding the "inflationary universe.. even if "Traveller" is to shallow to know about it ...

2006-08-03 02:41:21 · update #3

Ichi?...I'm attempting to implode my quantum with dark matter .. spontaneously combust ... and catch an electromagnetic lepton ride back to the beginning.. I do hope the maid will come and sweep up the little pile of ashes I leave in front of the computer .. you are correct Kant can't, Hume grabbed a zen shuttersplice, sartre is just angst .. des cartes thunk it last .. lol

2006-08-03 02:45:13 · update #4

And then there's agent M5's damn cat .. the male Ichisekhmet ..

2006-08-03 02:47:15 · update #5

sara is a shoein so far

2006-08-03 07:07:01 · update #6

5 answers

The freedom granted to women in Babylonia allowed them to hold and manage their own estates.... The mother here is always represented by a sign which means "goddess of the house."

Landed property developed in the hands of women because women were the first to farm the land, thereby establishing ownership of it.

Religion as an instrument to deprive women and make them dependant.

Christian kings commonly endowed their barons with the phrase, "Take that woman and her fief." The early centuries of the Christian conquest of Europe were largely occupied with acquisition lands from the pagan women.

a man shall "leave his father and his mother, and cleave unto his wife" (Genesis 2:24).

Naomi told her daughters-in-law to "return each to her mother's house" (Ruth 1:8) because houses were owned by mothers, not fathers.

A marriage agreement permitting removal of a woman from her maternal home was a violation of ancient laws. Therefore Abraham, seeking a bride for his son, had to give many gifts to the bride, to her mother, and to her brother (not to her father!) as compensation for taking her away from her home (Genesis 24:53).

Retention of property in the hands of a patrilineal clan was the purpose of the so-called Levirate marriage commanded by the patriarchal God (Deuteronomy 25:5). If a man died, his brother must marry the widow rather than allow her to take her property and depart from the family.

Priests married to gain property, claiming that without their wives they succumb to "hunger and nakedness." Church laws revised the system; then a series of papal decretals between 1031 and 1051 ordered priests to abandon their wives and sell their children into slavery. Naturally, the property and monies thus acquired by a priest revert to the church upon his death, since he no longer had legal heirs.

The legal/ecclesiastical war on female property ownership went on century after century, until women were so hamstrung by the laws of patriarchal God and man that they had almost nothing left that they could call their own.
By the end of the 19th century, English wives could not administer their own property even if they had any, nor make a will disposing of it, without their husbands' consent.
As late as 1930 in France and 1950 in Germany a woman was forbidden to do any business with a bank, not make small deposits, without her husband's permission.

Up to the present time, lack of control over money and property is still the greatest obstacle for women who wish to bring up their children respectably or take them and leave abusive or violent husbands. In this respect the centuries of patriarchal effort achieved their goal.

2006-08-03 03:05:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Are we talking to one's self?

Cogitationally speaking, we cogitiate to much:
I think we over think things.
I think therefore I think...there is no more to the ultimate truth than that, Decartes was a p*ssy that missed the point...

Ichi doesn't: he wants to kill and he kills...and then he licks his balls: he is closer to God than we ever will be

As our intelligence bounds forth we search for meaning where meaning is maybe not appropriate....

Metaphor time - you heard it hear first:
Our intelligence is a hose pipe that we have been able to turn on through societal evolution: but we are at the end with the valve: we have turned it on but we don't comprehend it's magnitude yet...We are not at the end where the water is coming out: that end is flailing around like crazy pointing in every direction, pointing us in a million directions stearing our beliefs, fears and hopes to looking for truths in religion, politics, philosophy....

Ichi brain hurt now...

Sacred Feminine indeed: You should read a book by a guy called Sir Lawrence Gardner (the one time head of the Knights Templar and twenty years ahead of the da vinci con and the Sacred blood boll*cks)...

..It is called Realm of the Ring Lords and studies the great works of literature through the ages after Jesus from the Bible to Lord of the Rings (sublime to the rediculous I hear you cry), and signifies the sacred feminie throughout....mind blowing stuff

He studies our spoken history rather than the written one
(which was all but wiped out in the dark ages)...the parables, folk tales, stories of elfs, fairies and imps and things and brings to life the fact that these are actually true but distorted through later literature....all refer back to anti-catholic truths of anti-feminism and all quashed to fit the Catholic doctrine...

That managed not to get written down but stay aloft in the air as spoken word through the ages (Brothers Grimm stuff....the Magdalene represented in Disney films, that sort of thing)...

Fascinating stuff - ichi sleep now...

2006-08-03 09:39:18 · answer #2 · answered by Ichi 7 · 0 0

I am eagerly awaiting further discussion on several aspects of "M-theory" which imply that the "big bang" was really not such a "big" deal. The thinking is that "branes" (or whatever) may sort of brush up against each other and periodically cause such things to happen. Ours may be just another big bang, not THE big bang.

2006-08-03 09:31:24 · answer #3 · answered by JAT 6 · 0 0

What's to think about? It's a bunch of weird stuff somebody made up (not you, I know) that has no basis in fact, science, or reality. Nothing in that rambling statement can be tested, verified, or even argued about since it's a bunch of new-wave nonsense.

2006-08-03 09:26:49 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

This is only formative to transhuman beings, thus, evolved from nondual organisms in a radical trasmutive response factor, it cancels out gods omnipotence.

2006-08-03 09:27:50 · answer #5 · answered by brian e 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers