English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I suggested maybe the world could come together as one country and live in peace

and got alot of responses saying I'm in league with the anti-christ?
world peace=anti-christ?

2006-08-02 08:23:05 · 31 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

31 answers

First, if the world all came together without border, it would not be a country, it would be a world.

For this to happen, a couple things would likely need to occur to a large degree.

1 - A unified world language. Since most people are so arrogant as to believe that the language that they speak is what everyone else should speak, it would be difficult to reach any form of common ground on this any time soon. Should a unified language actually start to develop, it would likely be made up of roots from several of the major world languages.

2- A somewhat unified world religion, or at least spiritual sense. Given the feedback you say you received, I'd say that people are also to arrogantly committed to the misnomer that their religion is the only right language, to even consider that mankind might reach some consensus on a spiritual basis.

3- Mankind would have to put their arrogance aside long enough to see other nations viewpoints as it pertains to politics, customs, culture and traditions. Again, most humans are too arrogant to believe that any way of doing things other than their way, is even worth considering.

4- The world would have to agree on a unified financial system.
While most countries would suddenly get caught up in an inflation at near historical levels, others would suffer recessions and all would suffer instability. Albeit, the Euro was a good exercises. Which suggests that this would need to happen a few countries at a time to prevent a world economic collapse.

5- People would in general, need to set aside their misguided idea of competition, ignorance and racism.

Now, lets say that some time down the road such a thing did happen. How long do you think it would take for the world to divide in to subcultures and social divides? (At least based on the current set of social standards that make up human nature).

Would there then be peace, or would malcontents still influence unrest? I think mankind is yet too immature for this to occur any time soon. But given systems such as fast travel and the internet, our world gets smaller all the time.

2006-08-02 08:40:15 · answer #1 · answered by Gonzo 4 · 0 0

Christ recommended 'That All May Be One' at the Last Supper, so it is certainly not 'anti-Christ. In fact most major religions foresee and want world peace. It is interesting in past geological history, there was a time that the whole world was one country, before the Atlantic and Pacific oceans formed. I think it is our truest human desire more on the grassroots, and before children are given their parents' or guardian's biases. War is caused at the upper levels of a country's administration usually, but the people themselves are not necessarily wanting war. Sometimes it is family members that are forced to war against each other, like the Serbs and Croats, and the Jewish Arabic Palistian people, or North and South Korea. A universal peace is in revelation, so you are on track. Please keep that dream and spread it. Enough people wanting it can make a difference eventually.

2006-08-02 08:34:29 · answer #2 · answered by martian 3 · 0 0

Wow. I read your other question, and the responses. I probably shouldn't be surprised, but...

Well, all I can say is, the people who brought up Christ/Anti-Christ in response to a non-religious question obviously have an agenda they are pursuing.

Religious proselytizers teach separitism. They teach people to set themselves apart from the rest of humankind, and tell them others who don't believe the same things that they do are wrong, even evil. So, your idea of an integrated world in which people live together harmoniously is anaethema to most religious doctrine being spread today.

I'm sorry to see yet more proof that such poisonous seeds of dissention fall on fertile ground.

You have the right idea, though; keep sharing your thoughts with others.

2006-08-02 08:52:36 · answer #3 · answered by functionary01 4 · 0 0

World peace is something every human on this earth should be hoping for it, But until the lust for power and the lust for wealth is done away with it will never happen. Now as for you wanting to have one world and world peace I can see how people can connect you with Satan, But what they are not doing is seeing is the whole picture of God wanting the same thing and stating that is what will be created under Jesus, The Christ. Its the same ole story people are reading thing but they are not reading it all the way thru therefore they are coming to the wrong conclusion. Yes Satan will play a big part in the one world thing, But God and Jesus will win out over Satan. As well as create total world peace.........

2006-08-02 08:52:09 · answer #4 · answered by kilroymaster 7 · 0 0

You did? That's crazy. I don't see why anyone should call you evil just because you want peace. You know a lot of people said similar things about the current Pope when he first started. He said he wanted to focus on world peace. He got a lot of criticism for it too. I suppose people would have felt better if he would have announced a new crusade to take the Holy Land back for Christianity. He's the Pope!!! What did they expect him to say. Don't let it get to you. Although I don't think humanity is ready for such a union yet it will happen someday. I seriously doubt it will happen in our life times, but I have faith in humanity. It may not seem that way, but there is much more good in this world than evil. We only see the bad though on TV. Look at Hurricane Katrina. It is true that a lot of people took advantage of the disaster to profiteer, so it brought out the worse in people, but the good in people was much, much stronger in this case. People from all over the world offered aid to the victims in their time of need. The U.S. Governemnet though was too damned proud to accept much of it. The best of humanity was shown in this disaster. Have faith.

2006-08-02 08:31:42 · answer #5 · answered by big_dog832001 4 · 0 0

Here's the dope on those that say you're in league with the AC...In the Book of Revelation (Bible) it speaks of a time near the end when all the nations unite under one leader and that leader is supposely the AC. Of course we also have to have 30 consecutive years of WORLD peace at some point during the "end times"...Since we aren't ever going to unite under one leader and there's not going to be 30 consecutive years of WORLD peace we aren't going to come to an end any time soon. PEACE!

2006-08-02 08:30:07 · answer #6 · answered by thebigm57 7 · 0 0

Have you ever heard of "The New World Order"? I think this is why you got this type of reaction. I'm sure you had good intentions, but a "one-world government" is one of the things associated w/ the New World Order (NWO). It also has to do with things like getting rid of currency, microchipping humans as a form of I.D. & some other things I don't remember. Do a search for it on the web & you should see what I mean.

2006-08-02 08:35:39 · answer #7 · answered by Steph 5 · 0 0

I didn't say you were in league, maybe someone else did, but when the antichrist takes control of the world he will install a one-world religious system, a one world economic system, and a one world government. He will fool everyone by making peace between the Jews and the Arabs, but it will not last. It will make everyone willing to let him run the world because they will think he is a super statesman.

2006-08-02 08:34:50 · answer #8 · answered by Grandma Susie 6 · 0 0

Who said you were in league with him? But prophecy does say that when men say, 'Peace, peace!', that is when destruction shall befall them. The world can only be safely united under the True Christ. But the AC must appear before that can happen.

2006-08-02 08:30:44 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

one million. No legendary beings does no longer imply no morals. two. Actions that damage one more man or women are immoral. Castro's movements violated that precept. Look up ethical reciprocity. Your god does not even condemn slavery, so do not declare your god is ethical. Your god is a beast that might torture non-believers for eternity. It's a well factor your god is a fable. The truth you cannot see it calls your ethical values into query. Morals come from persons running in combination to peer what we proportion in natural after which make legislation therefore. I understand that I do not what to be violently attacked or have my estate stolen. I anticipate all people else feels the identical. Given the ones in most cases shared attitudes, we make legislation that punish those who violate the ones standards. If mankind listened for your god, we might nonetheless have slavery, we might stone unruly kids and drive rape sufferers to marry their rapist. No thank you.

2016-08-28 13:51:38 · answer #10 · answered by cerenzia 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers