English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

by killing Palestinians and Lebanese. They have a LOOOOOOOOOG way to before the muder score book is finally balanced. When you have 6 million mudered relative behind you, it DOES give you SOME moral justification for WIPING out a FEW perceived enemies.

2006-08-02 03:51:13 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

6 answers

well, to be square, the jews would have to kill those people who were responsible for killing them in world war 2.
not the lebanese or palastinians. they weren't the ones who killed those 6 million jews. they probably didn't even know what the hell was going on.

its like someone shot my kid and then i shoot their brother-in-law. wtf kind of justice is that?

to be honest, it was the powers that be (the US, UK, russia, france, ect) who told the palastinians look we have to put these jews somewhere, now get the f*ck out. i'd be pissed off as all hell if that was me. it's an artificial country. i'm not saying jews shouldn't have their own state, but its not quite as easy as telling someone to move out and them saying "well, my family's lived here for 5 generations, sure! i'll move out!" the response i'm sure they got was the finger. and the PLO.

its not easy, logical, or fair. but hey, we have to figure something out, right?

2006-08-02 04:01:42 · answer #1 · answered by Aleks 4 · 0 0

There is a huge difference between a genocide and a war. In a genocide, only 1 side is doing the killing (or almost all the killing). In a war, both sides are fighting.


Fighting with Lebanon

The fighting with Lebanon can be traced back historically to other conflicts between the nations (1982 Peace for the Galilee Operation). However, the immediate cause was Hizbollah terrorists capturing Israeli soldiers and firing missiles into Israel. There's no question that Israel has the right to fight back, but the case could easily be made that Israel overreacted. I would say that if Israel shows what will happen if it's threatened, it could intimidate the members of Hebollah, preventing them from attacking again in the near future.
Keep in mind one thing about the war in Lebanon: Hezbollah targets civillians. Israel targets terrorists, killing some civillians in the process. The intent is completely different. Israel even drops flyers into civillian teratories to warn people that they must evacuate because an attack is coming. Hezbollah does not tell civillians to evacuate. It justs fires missiles.


Palestinian Conflict

This is just a case of the Palestinians claiming that it's their land because they lived their for the last few centuries. Israel claims that it also controlled the area historically (before the Ottomans) and that they currently own it because both the British, who owned the land before 1948, and the U.N. allowed them to come. Israelis also argue that the parts of the region partitioned to them had a Jewish majority. Palestinians argue that if you count the entire area (both sides' partitioned areas combined) had an Arab majority. Either way, the 2 sides don't get along. The Palestinians are led by Hamas, a terrorist group that does not recognize Israel's right to exist. Hamas also pledges to wipe Israel off the map. (This is ironic because they don't put the word "Israel" on their maps of the region.)
The fighting with the Palestinians isn't a genocide. Both sides are killing each other. You know about the Israeli's attacks, but the Palestinians constantly send suicide bombers. Also, once the Gaza Strip was returned to them, the didn't peacefully accept getting their way. They immediately used the land to fire missiles.




Israel is too small (9 miles wide at one point) to risk being attacked without defending itself. Any loss could destroy the country. Israel only attacks when provoked and Israel targets terrorists only. It's enemies target civillians. However, both sides have lost too many lives and civillian lives.

2006-08-02 11:12:41 · answer #2 · answered by x 5 · 0 0

well i think within the last 50 years they've killed a little more than 6 million who died in the range of 10 years
especially they were killing people in Palestine, lebanon, syria, egypt and jordan
so come on
since when is it right to kill people just so that the numbers are right
besdies, by what u r saying they better kill in percentages,, see the 6 million where what percent from jews and get that percentage of muslims to kill
cuz that's what they must be doing since they're wackos like you

2006-08-02 11:06:57 · answer #3 · answered by la_fille_en_blue 2 · 0 0

In God’s eyes killing one innocent human equals killing all humans since Adam. However, there is no evidence that 6 million Jews were killed in WW2, but they fled to mid west America (Ohio State) and this is why they refuse statistical surveys and analysis and consider it against their religion so no body discover the hidden facts. Wake up.
Their crimes against Muslim kids will not be forgotten and they will pay the price n full soon.

2006-08-02 11:50:37 · answer #4 · answered by lukman 4 · 0 0

Its not about a vendetta, its about not allowing radical terrorists to wipe out an entire population of people.

2006-08-02 10:58:06 · answer #5 · answered by Allison L 6 · 0 0

No, they just don't like people fighting for their rights it seems. I wonder if their next leader will be called Adolf...


http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Ai4TqUpBULegKUp96j81U5Tsy6IX?qid=20060802070751AAOxXZX

2006-08-02 11:09:28 · answer #6 · answered by googlywotsit 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers