An atheist asked me why is more plausible for a God to apear out of nowere and create us versus evolution?

Question

Can u help me with that?

Answer 1

It isn't.

Answer 2

The age old question - where did it all begin. How could we evolve from nothing? How could the universe exist, the gases that caused this explosion, who created that to cause us to become and evolve?

When people take a deeper look at themselves and each other, they will understand that people are not all that logical in the first place, and they are certainly not all that intelligent. We know so much, and yet our knowledge and technology is so limited by the prison of our human body and mind, that we actually have only scratched the surface of the possible knowledge available in the universe, time, space, whatever.

Does it really matter to that persons life if you don't think the way they do? Will it destroy them if you think differently? No, so why worry? Allow them to think as they choose, allow yourself to think as you choose. They have freewill so do you. You lead more people to God by living a life that shows you are content with your beliefs, and having your prayers answered, than by pointing out how wrong they are.

Answer 3

Even though i dont believe in god...


You starting answer is, What STARTED evolution??

You cannot EVOLVE from Nothing....
This does however end you in a Chicken Egg Situation....
with a stalemate...


However God COULD have Created Man, and man has SINCE
evolved to his Environment..... (as the environment has changed etc etc.... A fox is still a fox, even if it now lives in a city!)

Answer 4

there is not a shred of evidence to support evolution, just a lot of conjecture - here is a springboard- it is not directed at you, just something I have posted on other evolution questions so that the facts can be read by those who care :

I cannot make you believe something that you don't want to believe, but I urge you to use discernment, reason and logic when thinking aobut evolution- all the things evolutionists accuse us of not using , but really- do the principles of evolution make sense? If this has taken place over the course of millions of years, little by little, then we are being decieved when we are told we are looking for "the missing link" we are looking for millions of missing links- besides that- there are so many common sense, scientific questions that evolution just cannot answer- no matter how you twist it.
If you are really interested in education and not just disproving something that does not fit your mold- read this article, it is fun reading but very informative and common sense-
Meet Gaspy: the lungfish:

http://www.reflecthisglory.org/study/did...

here are other bits of interesting fact for you to ponder :

Charles Dawson, a British lawyer and amateur geologist announced in 1912 his discovery of pieces of a human skull and an apelike jaw in a gravel pit near the town of Piltdown, England . . . Dawson's announcement stopped the scorn cold. Experts instantly declared Piltdown Man (estimated to be 300,000 to one million years old), the evolutionary find of the century. Darwin's missing link had been identified. Or so it seemed for the next 40 or so years. Then, in the early fifties . . . scientists began to suspect misattribution. In 1953, that suspicion gave way to a full-blown scandal: Piltdown Man was a hoax . . . tests proved that its skull belonged to a 600-year-old woman, and its jaw to a 500-year-old orangutan from the East Indies." Our Times--the Illustrated History of the 20th Century (Turner Publishing, 1995, page 94).

Science Fiction
The Piltdown Man fraud wasn't an isolated incident. The famed "Nebraska Man" was built from one tooth, which was later found to be the tooth of an extinct pig. "Java Man" was found in the early 20th Century, and was nothing more than a piece of skull, a fragment of a thigh bone and three molar teeth. The rest came from the deeply fertile imaginations of plaster of Paris workers. "Heidelberg Man" came from a jawbone, a large chin section and a few teeth. Most scientists reject the jawbone because it's similar to that of modem man. Still, many evolutionists believe that he's 250,000 years old. No doubt they pinpointed his birthday with good old carbon dating. Now there's reliable proof. Not according to Time magazine (June 11, 1990). They published an article in the science section that was subtitled, "Geologists show that carbon dating can be way off." Don't look to "Neanderthal Man" for any evidence of evolution. Recent genetic DNA research indicates the chromosomes do not match those of humans. They do match those of bipedal primates (apes).

What does Science Say?
Here are some wise words from a few respected men of science: "Evolution is a fairy tale for grown-ups. This theory has helped nothing in the progress of science. It is useless." (Professor Louis Bounoure, Director of Research, National Center of Scientific Research). "Evolution is unproved and unprovable." (Sir Arthur Keith--he wrote the foreword to the 100th edition of, Origin of the Species). "Scientists who go about teaching that evolution is a fact of life are great con-men, and the story they are telling may be the greatest hoax ever." (Dr. T. N. Tahmisian, Atomic Energy Commission, USA).

"To suppose that the eye . . . could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest degree." Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species

A great resource for some education that is logical and common sense is called "The Science or Evolution: expand your mind" You can get this DVD from WayoftheMaster.com

The fact is there is nothing here that was not created, planned with a purpose in mind. Is there anything on this earth- not natural that just came together on its own. You can put pieces of 'stuff' in a box and put whatever conditions you choose and without a purpose and planning for that purpose, you won't get anything useful. I have yet to see anyone show matter being created out of nothing, or one species evolving into another or any proof of that happening. this world works in a clockwork type order , there is precision and purpose to everything you see - you cannot have purpose without a plan and you cannot have a plan without a planner- there is nothing that can disprove intelligent design. Period!

Answer 5

No one can help you with that -- because your argument relies on The Ontological Argument for the existence of God -- first proposed by St Thomas Aquinas in the 1300s. It has been shown to rely on a logical fallacy.

Belief in God relies on faith, not logic.

Answer 6

Personally the idea of a non God creation sounds like we are a random accident. Do you see life as an accident or a blessing? To me this world and our lives in it are blessings not some horrible accident.

Answer 7

And you think the mass particle appear out of nowhere, exploding causing the big bang.

Answer 8

God didnt apear, HE IS THE I AM.......NOT I WAS OR WILL BE

God always exsisted, he repented when he made man...lol

Answer 9

Makes more sense than some magic pixie