Guys would you rather date a women who was ugly and very adventurous, also great in bed. Or a women who was beautiful but a little boring and a prude. Not willing to try new things.
2006-08-01 19:51:43 · 7 answers · asked by Teslajuliet 4 in Family & Relationships ➔ Singles & Dating
I'll go where the chemistry is. Looks aren't everything, but there must be attraction
2006-08-01 19:55:42 · answer #1 · answered by JJ007 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd pass on both..and go for the woman who was nice, good looking and sexy...on the other hand maybe I'd just watch the football.
2006-08-01 19:56:51 · answer #2 · answered by michael m 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The boring but beautiful one, but that's just me
2006-08-01 19:56:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
neither, i'd just be friends (with benefits) with both. i'm gonna be honest, looks aren't everything, but they certainly play a part, and i'm too bored by myself to be with someone who bores me even more, so, i'll just chill with both of em every now and then.
2006-08-01 19:56:25 · answer #4 · answered by Six 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
id rather go with the ess un attractive 1 although all women are hot items in their own right buety is in the eye of the beholder isnt it???????
2006-08-01 20:31:47 · answer #5 · answered by nathan b 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the clicking factor with whomsoever it may click looks or adventourous comes at a later stage when it comes to marriage right now its about dating only
2006-08-01 19:58:06 · answer #6 · answered by godfather 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
um... looks are not everything. not all guys feel the same.
2006-08-01 19:54:28 · answer #7 · answered by Camaro 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋