Iran as we all know is researching nuclear power (rigggghhhht), but do we really want another Iraq? Innocent people and soldiers died in Iraq, and Iran is stronger and more populated meaning A LOT more people and soldiers will lose their lives. Is this the way to do things? War? What is to be done instead of senseless killings? What should be done to remove Ahmadinejat rather then destroying the country through bombs? The Iranian people are sick of the regime but they dont want to have their kids burried under rubble by American bombs as we all think the same.
2006-08-01 19:05:03 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
DC D you have a murderous state of mind and should be banned from opening your mouth. Bomb them? US has enough nuclear bomb to destroy the world 2ice. Should we bomb the F*** out of them ?
2006-08-01 19:23:09 · update #1
I lived in Iran for 8 years. I know more of the real world then you fhornsr. Dont talk when you got nothing good to say.
2006-08-01 19:28:10 · update #2
before i say any thing let me just say some thing to m1a1mikegolf
....i thing you are the only person who thinks like that...there is no proof of what you are saying...i think what you say is the effect of the corrupt media you watch 24 ours a day...
but...about the question...i realy think we should be a little fair..
of course we have to keep our eyes open... the ppl of iran should be concerned about the tragedy a nuclare bomb can bring, and even if the regim wants to produce such weaponds only the people can stop them....for the rest of the world ,they also should know what a nucke bomb can do ,not only to the present generation but to their children and their garnd children.....the people of the world should not only stop the iranian regim from producing nuclear weapond (which we dont know for sure if they even want to do it) but they should prevent other coutries like the US ...isreal....russia ...pakistan ...india...north korea..cte...producing such weaponds..
nuclear weapon is a threat to the world .....it doesnt make much diffrence which contry has it....as long as the nuclear weapon exists,the threat exists...
2006-08-03 20:49:06 · answer #1 · answered by sonic_zerocool 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ignorance or denial is not an answer. You may think that Iran is not a threat... Until something happens.. Ask yourself... do you really want to take a chance on that? I have seen first hand how these people think. I've deployed twice to Iraq. Once during the war and the second time in the city of Falluja during the operations. The first chance they get, they will attack us. In this world, there will always be those who use violence as an answer. We can not back down from that challenge.
2006-08-02 15:38:44 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You seem to be the only person in the world who has not figured out that Iran wants nuclear weapons. And also appear to be the only person in the world to think that Iran will not use nuclear weapons in a 'first strike' on a middle east country populated by people whose religion is different than theirs.
Think about it - Iran uses nukes, Israel retaliates with nukes and the populations of both countries are annihilated.
Or - a coalition of countries can conduct selective attacks to destroy the Iran's nuclear facilities in order to prevent a future nuclear war.
Which course of action will kill fewer people?
2006-08-02 03:14:34 · answer #3 · answered by MikeGolf 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Israeli government prayed for the attack on Iraq and Iran, which has eliminated the strategic threat posed by Iran and Iraq. America was pushed into the war by a group of Neo-Conservatives, almost all of them Jews, who had a huge influence on the White House. In the past, some of them had acted as advisers to Binyamin Netanyahu.
2006-08-01 19:12:15 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Iraq is nothing compared to what the US can expect if it invades Iran. Unfortunately, many Republicans haven't learned the lesson from Iraq and may support another war.
2006-08-01 19:09:09 · answer #5 · answered by OMG!!!! 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Leaders choose to have a solid conflict below their belt for the checklist. squaddies be killed? They joined up did no longer they? they are prepared to kill others are not they? If the armed provider chiefs would tell the government that they are going to easily combat to shelter the placement of beginning place and to no longer faux that politically disliked international places pose a brilliant gamble which they do no longer then...
2016-12-10 19:51:53 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As long as there are people in the world who resort to violence to get what they want or where they want to be, there will be wars. Grow a set of cojones and get use to it.
Oh yeah ... and we do NOT "all think the same." Perhaps a bit of exposure to the real world and to a few facts will open your eyes, but somehow I doubt it.
2006-08-01 19:26:10 · answer #7 · answered by fhornsr 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
mark my words......its the beginning of world war 3...its heading to that direction slowly but surely...and this is for sure that US days would be over once the world war ends...its gonna e russia and china standing with muslim power houses...iran and pakistan...whereas north korea would also be thee 4 support of this club.while the other side would comprise of USA, UK, india and israel alongwith European Union minos....but the balance of power is most likley to be shiftd to the first group of china russia iran pakistan!! its gonna b india in most trouble followed by israel!! its gonna happen sooner than later!!! China is coming!!
2006-08-01 19:18:27 · answer #8 · answered by Zuhair-from-pakistan 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
..Give them the chance to step down w/ nulear research, if they decide not to...bomb the f*** out of them
2006-08-01 19:10:10 · answer #9 · answered by DC D 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Thats what they make nukes for.
2006-08-01 19:08:43 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋