can we do ww3 with out nukes?

Question

if this ts ww3 and i think it is will some one toss out a nuke if yes who will and who will get hit what will the responce be

several questions here

Answer 1

I don't necessary think this is WWIII but, if it is I think limited nukes will be used. There are different sizes of nukes. Tactical nukes may be imployed to affect small areas. These are the types of nukes I think will be used. I don't think it will be everyone shooting off everything they have.
As for who and where I don't really know. I do worry about Iran getting nuke technology. They are just crazy and extremist enough to use them.

Answer 2

In my opinion, it will be Israel who launches first, at Syria. The US and UK would condemn the action, but still support Israel. Meanwhile further east, India and Pakistan are watching, both sides will consider launching at each other, Pakistan will back down from the option, India (which is also backed by the United States) will probably follow through (expecting US support, regardless). The United States will avoid the India-Pakistan conflict, having learned from that past that a two front war is not the best way of going about things. Middle East will be in total chaos, Israel will lose her war, with Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Lebanon, and Iran. Palestine will be reenstated. North Korea will bomb (nuclear or not is unclear, maybe one or two nuclear) South Korea and Japan with Japan retaining it's status, while North Korea absorbs South Korea. China will enter and take Taiwan, also will ally with Russia and make a stand against the US's global presence. US economy severely disrupted, no longer the lone superpower, will begin the process of collapse as will Europe. The world after the war will leave 3 superpowers, an Egypt/Saudi Arabia alliance, China, and Russia. Russia and China have long standing differences and will end up in a cold war, Egypt and Saudi Arabia will ally with China because they are the stronger workforce and will consume more oil, China will survive as the lone superpower.

I'm aware this is way more than asked for, but this is just a scenerio I consider most likely.

Answer 3

First you say can we "do" it without nukes, then you say "will someone toss out a nuke?" So you are asking two different questions. I think we should think of ways to avoid using nuclear weapons, and especially we should not think in terms of war, instead of wondering if someone is going to start throwing nukes.

This is the first time I've heard of someone "doing" a war, as though it were an illegal drug. Let's hope war doesn't become an addiction!

Answer 4

I think that would be a good possibility IF North Korea or Iran get involved and have what they say they have. I think that Iran would hit an Allies military target in Iraq. Of course, Israel is ticking off a lot of people over there right now. So, maybe they would strap a kid or woman with a nuke and have them walk into the local Israeli mini-mart and set them self off.

Answer 5

We did World War 1 with out nukes... What makes you think nukes will be necessary for the next big one?

Answer 6

it wouldnt matter who hits and who will get hit, cuz everyone will be dead at the end. the best thing to do would be to move to some neutral country away from the US, europe, East Asia and the Middle East, or just run away to North Eastern Russia, live in the wilderness and come back to the world after 5 years.

Answer 7

I suppose that there might firstly be stalemate however finally North America and Europe might win. This is for the reason that of some of the best science that during specific the American, British, and French armies have.

Answer 8

We're working on it. No nukes so far.

Answer 9

what in the hell r u trying to say. WWIII will be war of all wars you can count on it.