Why do they try and tell people that Man walked along side of T-Rex? When we know that the mammals of the time were small rodent like creatures. Maybe they found a skeleton of "T-Rex" man and are waiting to Surprise the world in the next Paleontology Journal?
2006-08-01
14:20:59
·
17 answers
·
asked by
TommyTrouble
4
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
T-Rex strode around here last week I'm sure I saw him at Taco Bells picking up his order of Edmontosaurus burritos LOL 8-)
Do you know what a coprolite is? It's fossilized Dino Dung. Go outside in your back yard and take a dump and bury it and see how long it takes to Fossilize.
You want to believe in God, go ahead, but don't be a fool about it.
2006-08-01
14:47:05 ·
update #1
You are confused between evolutionary beliefs and science. They are NOT the same. Evolution is a belief about the past to explain the present. It is NOT science. In fact, evolution has abused science to propagate its belief system. So, the popular "science fact" is that dinosaurs were long dead before man came onto the scene. Well, how did they KNOW that? What's the evidence? The fossil record? Well, it is admittedly incomplete so how can they be so sure? Is the evidence driving the conclusion or the ideology driving the conclusion? We found scores of living fossils, life forms that should have been long dead but still with us. Isn't that also a form of dinosaur with man scenario? Using T-Rex has the jarring effect of making it sounds so out of this world. But the real question is not about T-Rex, but about whether the evolution story we have been told is true. I don't think so!
2006-08-01 14:42:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by Seraph 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
That psychochick is....psycho.
I understand what you are saying. But I have no idea what you are talking about. And I mean I don't know what kind of example goes behind this.
Do you mean Adam and Eve and how they were around a long time ago? Orr..
?
Science, from what little I have learned in class about evolution, says that the first BIPEDAL species was the Australopethicus (excuse my spelling). That means to stand up right. And that came around about 4 million years ago. But I think there might be somme species that were discovered to explain off the whole "small rodent like creatures". As in..there could have been more than just that.
2006-08-01 14:50:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am both a degreed Theologian and Bible Teacher (for 35 years) and also an adamant "Astronomer" (with a Ph.D) and presently living on the grounds of the Lowell Observatory...where the world's greatest land-based telescopes can be found in the Northern Hemishpere. I have studied and taught the Bible and Pastored 3 churches in my career and hold both a Th.M (Masters) and Th.D (Doctorate) degrees in Biblical Theology. Christianity does NOT "attack" true science, as long as "science" doesn't conflict with the Bible's account of Creation and attempt (as science so often does) to prove and teach "Theory" as an established "fact". Pseudoscience is merely "false science" or some other medium cloaking under the "name" of Science...and will of course be attacked. But that so-called "attack" is far more defensive than it is offensive. I am both a Theologian and an Astronomer...and living PROOF that both "faith" and "science" can indeed coexist my friend....and here's another little bit of information not well-known to the ourside world: MORE Astronomers NOW believe in the direct act of Creation and privately OPPOSE the so-called "Big Bang" or the many "String Theories"...but remain quiet about it to protect their families and careers.
2006-08-01 14:46:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by LARRY M 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I don't hear man walked alongside T-Rex. Maybe somebody is saying that, not many people.
You have to read the article before you can judge it. There's nothing wrong with giving a theory.
They aren't attacking science.
2006-08-01 14:27:16
·
answer #4
·
answered by JoeIQ 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You're dumb.
You too Ann Tykreist...
and Some dude.
Yeah, let's just not believe in anything so we can live in our own little world with Giggles the Fairy and the Invisible Pink Unicorns because we can't believe anything that does not exist in our little world...
So I guess you don't believe in brains, either.
Oh, yeah, that's right...God didn't create us...the little pygmies and dustmites did. They thought it was a good science experiment. I guess they got an A.
2006-08-01 14:25:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by Hott Mama 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I am a follower of Jesus. I have no problem with a scientist attempting to determine the origins of life in the universe. What I do have a problem with is the scientist who thinks the magnificent intracacies of the universe and of life just happened by itself. In my world I see nothing creating itself. Everything from a pyramid to a bird coop is made by intelligent design, and left unattended, it disintegrates. As hard as it is for a person's brain to imagine or comprehend it, there is a God who, out of nothing, has made the universe. He/she is a God far beyond our understanding but has revealed himself in the Bible. Imagine a book written over hundreds of years by hundreds of authors, but bringing a coherent story of God's creation and intervention in his creation, predicting what would happen, and then recording the happening. Amazing! Fortunately for us, He/She is a loving God, but also a God who is just.
2006-08-01 14:49:21
·
answer #6
·
answered by saddlesore 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Their faith is weak.
I tell them this to help them understand:
"Let me give you an example of natural selection: when you were conceived, only one sperm out of millions made it to the egg. If that particular sperm had not made it, maybe you would have been born a girl, or have hazel eyes. Would God love you any less if that had happened?
So EITHER God used a process of natural selection to create you, OR He directed that particular sperm on its path in a way indistinguishable from natural selection. The same applies to all organisms throughout all of time. Natural selection is only partially random."
2006-08-01 14:25:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is much more accurate to say that SOME Christians have a problem with science, not all, not even most. The largest Christian Church is the Catholic Church and it has no arugument with science or even with evolution.
2006-08-01 14:26:17
·
answer #8
·
answered by jakejr6 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I saw that load of crap on TV last week. Pottery with iguanas painted on them are supposed to be proof that man saw dinosaurs.
Here's a news flash: dinosaurs are still around. They are called lizards.
2006-08-01 14:26:16
·
answer #9
·
answered by normobrian 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Christians will try anything to bolster their losing battle with intelligent people.
2006-08-01 14:26:15
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋