you already know the answer to this...usa...bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki.....it ended the war with japan....and i am glad it was done...it was estimated that if the USA had to invade japan, the loss of life on both sides would have been horrific....this has been talked about for 60 years and judged and talked about...i would ask if you ever talked to a survivor of the Bataan march??? i have.
2006-08-01 14:11:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by bushfan88 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Since we are the ones who bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the US is so far the ONLY country to have bombed civilian targets. This was done to end a war with an enemy who was fanatical till the end.
Iran does not possess nuclear weapons as yet and they may be within a number of years of getting them. But since Iran does not have nuclear weapons, how can they use them?
2006-08-01 21:14:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by the_observer 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The firebombing of Dresden and nuclear destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were war crimes, genocide should also include civilian victims of aerial bombardment. Even after saying this, i still don't think the Allies were close to the moral depravity of the Nazis and their wholesale holocaust of the Euopean Jews.
The bombing of civilians is a great tragedy, none can deny. It is not so much this or the other means of making war that is immoral or inhumane. What is immoral is war itself.
2006-08-01 21:31:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by Its not me Its u 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The same country that has come to the rescue of everyone else that gets their *** in a crack and Affords you the freedom to get on here and speak freely. If you lived in Iran would you have access to things like this you Idiot? Can't you understand that these people do not negotiate it is a sign of weakness and only Complete Victory will get the point across .
You should be ashamed of the fact that you question the methods that protect you .
2006-08-01 21:18:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
He wasn't asking a question he was publishing information.
Yes, the Aton Bomb was used on Japan. No one to date has used a nuclear weapon. It was not a terriorist act.
Japan bombed pearl harbor and killed thousands of innocent people. Men, women and children.
They were involved in a terrible masacure of American citizens
Not realizeing what an atom bomb would do 3 were dropped on Japan. It was in retaliation.
Let that be a lesson to you. The Emperor said, "I am afraid we have awoken a sleeping giant."
First comes a terriorist act, which is what Japan did.
Then came hate as they put them in camps.
then came anilation. They were almost removed from the face of the earth.
As I said earlier Japan did it first.
Islamic terriorists hit the trade towers and killed innocent people.
Now we are retaliateing. If you don't like to get bombs dropped on you. Don't do bad things to people.
2006-08-01 21:17:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
True. It's the USA. So why would Iran want to have nuclear weapons too if they are so horrible?
2006-08-01 21:09:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by Zelda Hunter 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
USA. These WMD ended World War 2.
p.s. Who authorized and approved their use? It was Harry S Truman....*gasp* a Liberal Democrat!!!!!1
2006-08-01 21:09:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by Albannach 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
not sure what your question is exactly .. its the united states, as you already know.
interesting point you bring up about crimes against humanity in war tho .. see the thing is, if you lose the war, the leaders can be prosectured for war crimes; but if you are the 'winner' this doesnt happen. everything is perception and everything is relative.
2006-08-01 21:09:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by illinois_guy06 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The USA did . Read American History. Take a chill, calm down and don't rant.
2006-08-01 21:22:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
USA was first. Humanity crimes are always being committed but nobody wants to do anything about it.
2006-08-01 21:09:21
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋