English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

45 answers

USA as long as W is in office

2006-08-01 13:31:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Probably North Korea, at the moment, as ineffective as their missles may have been.

Countries that act as lightning rods for other countries' hatred could be SAID to be threats to world peace, if only because they function as targets for aggression--and then they react with even greater aggression once they're attacked. That would be true of both the USA and Israel.

Unfortunately, world history has shown that sympathy doesn't go to victims. Instead, victims are universally despised for their presumed weakness, and people, instead of being sympathetic, think up all sorts of reasons as to why the victims might have done something to make them targets for hateful acts. Therefore, it does no good to react to being attacked by turning the other cheek and making pacifist declarations. I believe that that's why the USA and Israel act as they do. I'm sorry, but that's just the way that it is: If you're not tough, then you get stomped-on.

Iran is a country that was involved in a long war with Iraq several decades ago. Both countries were sending their small boys off to war as cannon fodder. So it cannot be said that the Middle East would be a peaceful area if only Israel did not exist and if only the USA did not interfere militarily or politically. This has always been a region that has suffered periodic strife and violence, and I believe that nothing will change this.

Iran will, I believe,commit whatever violence that they can, if only to show the world how powerful they are. They are like North Korea in this way. If they're allowed to develop effective weapons, then they will use them--for aggression, not for defense.

2006-08-01 13:44:08 · answer #2 · answered by Cyn 6 · 0 0

I think people believe that if Hezbollah gained Israel’s territory that they would be happy and all the terrorist conflict would end there. I know this is not the case. Terrorist Muslims hide behind a cloak of religion whilst they seek to gain ultimate world power. The Koran states that Allah cannot return until the world is cleansed of all infidels (anyone who does not believe in Allah).You start to get a understanding of why they hate the rest of the non-Muslim world when you read the tenants in the Koran and the Hadiths.I read more militant rhetoric in the Koran and Hadiths than I ever heard or read in my eight years active duty in the Army. These Muslim holy books call for them to do all that you have seen the terrorists doing in the last 50 years. It should not be a surprise to anyone that they are doing what they’re bible and Muslim clerics tell them to.Isreal is just a speed bump and the rest of the world is the mission. If you don’t believe that the average Muslim agrees with the terrorist’s actions then explain to me why they were dancing in the streets after 9/11.Good day to all of you, and may our future generations never have to endure the scourge of religious tyranny in the future.

2006-08-01 13:30:53 · answer #3 · answered by isaac a 3 · 0 0

Actually,greediness is the one that endanger the peace of the world. Those who have been crowned with name called " terrorism" just because they want to protect their homeland that have been attacked and ruled by intruders. Terrorists which named by some countries are more pointed at those who endangered the benefits of some specific countries in terms of economically and militarily. Why said Iran is dangerous just because it's research for nuclear energy? Why countries like US can possess nuclear energy and others like North Korea and Iran can't? Is Israel as a base of some country for strategic purposes of cruel oil in mid east can kill innocents in the name of justice or just because its benefits have been endangered?

2006-08-01 13:59:12 · answer #4 · answered by josephlau86 2 · 0 0

Interesting question... If you check in the bible (Yes it has some good information on this subject) It states there will be wars and rumors of wars until the end of time. Prophecy so far has held true. There has never been one year in the last 43 years Ive been alive that was Conflict or war free. NOT ONE... answer your own question on "world peace" if you can because so far NO ONE SEEMS TO WANT IT TO BAD ENOUGH... A random act of peace would be refreshing and drive the news people nuts on things to report...

2006-08-01 17:16:54 · answer #5 · answered by eldertrouble 3 · 0 0

hey the answer is Iran because the BIBLE speaks of a time when 1/3 of man kind would be whipped complete,the river Euphrates divides Israel from you know Syria, Irack and Iran.

Matthew 24:6-8: "And ye shall hear of wars and rumours of wars: see that ye be not troubled: for all these things must come to pass, but the end is not yet. For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers places. All these are the beginning of sorrows.
.

2006-08-01 13:47:00 · answer #6 · answered by T.MFEMF 2 · 0 0

Ozi, you know the Jews run the world. And they would not do anything to hurt themselves. So the world is safe from Jews.

You, on the other hand, are in danger. Now that we know how you feel, we will be watching you.

We will get you. Some day, or late at night, when you are least expecting it, we will come for you.

Always look over your shoulder. Man or woman, or perhaps a remote controlled animal, like a wild dog or pig.

We don't yet know when or how, but we do know this: WE WILL GET YOU!!!

2006-08-01 13:34:59 · answer #7 · answered by profdave99 3 · 0 0

Any person who thinks that Bush is a threa to world peace is an idiot who fails to see the whole picture? Was there world pece before Bush? Let me think:
Constant attacks against Israel.
Various Aggressive conuntries working towards nukes.
NK selling anything and everything to prop up its failing economy.

It was only a matter of time before something happened, and domething happened indeed.

September 11th, 2001 happened.

Bush used the impetus of the attack to shake America into action. Instead of pulling a Chamberlin (letting evil fester), he chose to take action. And even in you disagree with actions that he takes, realize that he has done something important: he acted. Peace is nice and all, but letting ourselves be harrassed without stop (like the Israelis have given in to every demand, even as the Palestinians continue to attack) is worse.

2006-08-01 13:46:51 · answer #8 · answered by riven3187 3 · 0 0

iam supried that you includeed america in your question, without lloking at the dangerous this war has createdd, like over in iran we are trying too teach them world peace and dolpomacy at its best and yet, we are losing young people over this from this country etc, i know thats the price of war no argument there but does the people of iran really want thyis world peace thing, husain railroadeed them for years as a martyarr, etc, and now we are just trying too deal with terrorism which is, a real threat too this country look at 9-11, i cant never forget the images of the worlds trade centers etc, yeah we are striving for world peace towards this country and iran , iraq but are we getting threw too them is this what they really want etc?/ thios war may drag on forever, etc iam afaridd, for worlds peace let them decide on whats best not some other country etc

2006-08-01 13:35:14 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Iran

2006-08-01 13:32:34 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Out of those 3 I would say Iran but N. Korea is quite dangerous as well

2006-08-01 13:31:50 · answer #11 · answered by funlady6632@yahoo.com 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers