The roman catholic church has a deeply disturbing history of corruption, brutality,cruelty, greed and abuse. Although the first priests, ie rabbis were family men, and later the followers of christ were encouraged to marry, the catholic church was losing its horde of money and property to the children of priests so decided it would be financially securer to prohibit marriage. They also hated women who they believed were the reason for the expulsion from Eden, and that if a holy man had relations then he was cohorting with the enemy.
I know things have supposed to have changed, but i dont believe it.
2006-08-01 15:35:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by Allasse 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
Priests take a vow of celebacy to imitate Christ. Nowhere in the bible does it say that Christ ever had sexual relations. So therefore that is why they cannot marry or have sexual relations. They choose to follow Christ's example. As for the reason they encourage marriage and having children-- not everyone is cut out to remain celebate for their entire lives. The bible says we should only have sex inside of marriage. The true purpose for sex is to propagate. Therefore, priests encourage marriage for the purpose of having children. Priests do know what family life is. After all, they have parents and siblings too. You don't need to be married or have children to know what family life is. You posed a very good question.
2006-08-01 13:14:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
No where in the Bible does it teach that priests are not to marry. So i believe this is something that the Catholic church has instituted on its own outside of the Bible.
When God gave Eve to Adam she said it's not good for a man to be alone.
While Paul does make the point that as a single person you can do more ministry wise-- we see in the books of 1 and 2 Timothy (addressed specifically to Timothy on how to conduct himself in ministry) that he says be a one woman man, raise a Godly family, etc. (rough paraphrase).
i think your observations are profound and you make a great point. Personally i'm a youth pastor and really looking forward to getting married in the near future...
2006-08-01 12:50:03
·
answer #3
·
answered by Nickster 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Priests are "married" to the body of christ which is the church> a true Priest must be able to devot 100% of his time,energy, etc. to God, if he had a family, it would be harder to remain focused>
2006-08-01 12:49:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
<> merely through fact something it legal does no longer advise this is precise. <> there's a reason you may no longer spell 'anticipate' with out '***'. people who anticipate too plenty finally end up making asses of themselves. <> does not make sense, does it - and yet, there you're advocating human beings in basic terms anticipate the government is solid! <> incorrect! <> advert hominem assaults harm your credibility. possibly Marc, like me, does not see too plenty interior the way of credibility while analyzing your question. <> The term "fetus" actually skill "the greater youthful interior the womb". The fetus IS a residing individual. life starts at concept, no longer beginning nor some arbitrary element in between. as a result, each and every abortion constitutes the homicide of an unborn individual. <> however the fetus IS human. as a result, abortion IS homicide. <> what's so narrow minded approximately acknowledging the unborn for the residing human beings they are? because you at the instant can not do this, does not that advise your ideas is largely greater narrow than mine? <> That merely is going to instruct how schizophrenic human institutions could be - and you opt to anticipate such an corporation (the government) is solid.
2016-10-01 09:00:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by duffina 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
For one thing, if priests can't marry, then they can't have legitimate heirs and thus Church property isn't sucked into private hands--but all that was more of a concern under feudalism.
2006-08-01 12:50:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It seems to me that lots of them have kids but in totally the wrong way. Bloody hypocrites.
2006-08-01 12:56:29
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think it is good example of Extremism
2006-08-01 19:31:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by Suomi 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
the hypocracy of religion.
only bum-bells and door-mats follow it word for word and BELIEVE!!.
2006-08-01 13:05:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by robynbiker 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
incest
2006-08-01 12:47:42
·
answer #10
·
answered by fatgirl2food 1
·
0⤊
0⤋