What is the area to be circumcised for females?
Health activists claim that circumcising the clitoris decreases the sexual excitement that can be experienced by females. Also regarding oral sex; is it HARAM or is it better not to practice it? Is it allowed for the husband to pleasure his wife’s clitoris with his tongue and similarly is the wife allowed to pleasure her husband’s penis with her tongue ensuring that she does not touch the mazi or mani excreted by the husband?
2006-08-01 10:56:40
·
answer #1
·
answered by ~Devilz~ 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Female circumcision is total removal of the clitoris. It prevents the woman from having any enjoyment during sex and also diminishes her desire for sexual relations. It is mostly done in some African tribes when the girls are very young. It's done without anaesthesia and with dirty instruments ranging from a knife to a piece of glass. It's a horrible and barbaric practise which cannot be compared to a male circumcision.
Get the facts before you open your mouth next time!
2006-08-01 18:07:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by Cheryl K 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Male circumcision is even starting to get outdated so why bother with the women... (although of course, there are cultures that still practice circumcision - but I do not find the need for it)
2006-08-02 02:25:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by boo0726 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
u must be young, did u know that the piece that hangs out alil use to be a penis that dient form and the lips was suppose to be the balls but they dient sag? see when ur in ur motha's womb that is how it all starts out, then they form n the male sex looses the ovarys n all.. so next time learn what u r takin bout,
2006-08-01 17:56:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by devil_queen_biatch14 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am not even sure that is possible. I guess it would have to be and individual decision made by the family the same as it is for males.
2006-08-01 17:58:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by Suesan W 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
most women are in North and East Africa. It's a cultural thing as horrible as it sounds
2006-08-01 17:56:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by sar-mir 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
no because they will not feel pleasure( it brings birth problems because they are no birth canal) and it will not make any difference as to transfer AIDS.( because male circumcision reduces the likeliness to bleed during penetration thus reduces the chances to transfer AIDS)
2006-08-01 18:02:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by d_eyecandy 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No but I think you are a moron, if you don't like it perhaps you find yourself a guy with a nice circumsized penis to play with since you obviously prefer them.
2006-08-01 17:56:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by dappersmom 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
What 3rd world society are you from. Why not remove your prostrate? Also with out anesthesia.
2006-08-01 17:59:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by chief8166 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
They have a cosmetic surgery for that. I'm not sure on the specifics.
2006-08-01 17:58:25
·
answer #10
·
answered by JoeIQ 4
·
0⤊
0⤋