Lets try again. Going for second round.Was the interpretation of IT wrong before Christian came in and explain

Question

Many ppl when answering to trinity Question are trying to refer to Geneses when God refers to him self as God’s and consider that to be prove of trinity. Well OT was not written for Christians it was written for Jews. I don’t know a single Jew that will support idea of Trinity. So OT for all that time before Christian era was interpreted wrong?

lokking for an argument:)
One thing to note that even if there is a only god and holy spirit we still would say "GOD's" on what base do they even got the idea of trinity from Geneses?

Answer 1

I have to agree with koresh. Say, that first name wouldn't happen to be DAVID would it???? Hahahaha

Answer 2

How could a Jewish person agree with the idea of trinity when the 2nd person of the trinity is Jesus the Christ/Messiah?

Do you really want an answer or are you just looking for an argument? Not being sarcastic, just asking a serious question.

Answer 3

But the Christian view is that the OT was written for Christians and the Jews were just the caretakers until Jesus.

Answer 4

That is exactly what the current crop of Christian will tell you. They an only they understand the OT. The term you refer to is Eloheem. It is in essence plural. It can be referring to judges, Gods, and Goddesses (it is inclusive of the female aspect of personality). My guess is that it is an old polytheistic reference that was not altered over time. "Let US make man in OUR own image."

Answer 5

They do not know who Melchizedek king of Salem was!
Nor do the have a clue of the holy spirt.

It was John who wrote:
"In the beginning there was the word and the word what with God and the word was God"