Killing someone in self defense, or in defense of others is not a sin.
As a soldier, killing someone in war is also not a sin. However we also have a responsibility to protest or conscientiously object to unjust war.
The “just war” doctrine requires rigorous consideration to determine if defense by military force is legitimate.
Offensive war is never justified.
All the following considerations must be true to justify war:
1. The damage inflicted by the aggressor on the nation or community of nations must be lasting, grave, and certain;
2. All other means of putting an end to it must have been shown to be impractical or ineffective;
3. There must be serious prospects of success;
4. The use of arms must not produce evils and disorders graver than the evil to be eliminated.
With love in Christ.
2006-08-02 18:30:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by imacatholic2 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
To lie in wait to kill - it is Murder.
To take life unwittingly or without for thought is not.
War is totally different and the sin IF ANY falls on the government only!
Note that in war there are rules of conduct. Unless commanded by the government you do not rape, disfigure the dead, slay non combatants.
This would be Sin
2006-08-01 05:38:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by Grandreal 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Defending your country while serving in the military is not killing so long as you follow authorized, competent orders from your superiors. The only exception to this rule is murdering known and unarmed civilians--called collateral damage.
Each citizen is supposed to support and defend his country, even if it means serving in the Armed Forces.
It is not a sin except for the situation I explained above.
2006-08-01 05:25:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by Guitarpicker 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No it is not a sin to kill when your country has authorized one to kill someone else. The authorities are to bear the sword (kill if need be), Romans 13:4.
2006-08-01 06:31:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by jefferyspringer57@sbcglobal.net 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
In a proper Jewish war (approved by the king, Court of 71 sages, and possibly prophets), or in self defence, you are allowed to kill the enemy. Murder is prohibited.
2006-08-01 05:29:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by ysk 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think the best way for me to answer this question is to simply state the truth that all sin is forgivable. Sin is anything that belittles the glory of God. God's glory would also be belittled if God simply swept sin under a rug. Since God desires to forgive the ungodly, but cannot tolerate His glory to be belittled, He killed His own Son (Christ) to purchase forgiveness for sinnners and to uphold His glory.
Forgiveness of sin is attained through faith in God, specifically faith that He has paid for my sins through Christ. This purchase rights the wrong standing of man, and enables man once again to realize God and His glory as the object of his affections, rather than sin (the belittling of God's glory).
2006-08-01 05:31:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by Aaron W 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
A true Christian is a pacifist. Therefore any Christian who kills has commited a sin, and more so by putting themselves in the position where they are required to kill, has willingly sinned.
2006-08-01 05:23:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's wrong to kill, period. No one has the right to take another person's life.
Wars don't make anything right. They just make wrongs the popular thing to do.
The golden rule is 'God's' law of karma in action: what you do to others will be done to you, giving you the opportunity to learn right from wrong. Soldiers have sad and gruesome karma ahead of them.
2006-08-01 05:24:29
·
answer #8
·
answered by Sweetchild Danielle 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
That is up to God -
The true christians would not fight in a war and kill others
2006-08-01 05:20:53
·
answer #9
·
answered by Ron K 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
conflict isn't a piece a Christian would desire to take part in no remember what Augustine argues for. Christians would desire to stay independent in all issues conflict. Jehovah supported holy wars. He became the only that instructed the kings and monks while to pass to conflict. He became in comprehensive administration and an mind-blowing form of of the cases did an mind-blowing form of the artwork. while kings and monks did pass to conflict with out the consent of Jehovah they many times died in conflict or terrible outcomes led to their disobeying God. There are no kings or monks that has considered one of those dating with God on the earth at present. considered one of our articles has some solid bullet factors approximately conflict: Does God’s commanding Israel to break the Canaanites justify human conflict at present? No, for a minimum of three motives: ? No earthly u . s . at present has specific want with God. while the Israelites rejected Jesus through fact the Messiah, they ceased to represent God in any valid means—alongside with that of executioners. (Matthew 21:40 two, 40 3) Jehovah as a result held the Israelites to an identical common as different countries. (Leviticus 18:24-28) From that element on, no earthly u . s . ought to rightly declare to have God’s backing in conflict. ? Jehovah no longer assigns his worshippers to any particular land or geographic region. extremely, his servants could be modern-day in “all countries and tribes” of the earth.—Revelation 7:9; Acts 10:34, 35. ? Jesus of course indicated that his followers does not have interaction in conflict. while warning of an drawing near attack on Jerusalem, he urged his disciples to no longer stay and combat yet, extremely, to flee, which they did. (Matthew 24:15, sixteen) extremely of taking over palms, genuine Christians placed their comprehensive have faith in God’s Kingdom, which will quickly do away with all wickedness from this earth.—Daniel 2:40 4; John 18:36.
2016-10-01 08:34:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋