To those who have plenty of ideas of this topic, please leave as much points as possible on this debate topic. You can either state you agree with the statement or disagree with it. Help is deeply appreciated.
2006-08-01 01:45:30 · 2 answers · asked by Noobified 1 in Education & Reference ➔ Other - Education
I disagree.
If someone is rich and only gambles away $100.00 at blackjack, then it is harming no one.
My family gets together and plays poker for a penny...it's still gambling, but only on a small scale for entertainment.
What about indian casinos? Poor communinties were able to find a means of supporting themselves.
2006-08-01 02:43:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Basically I agreed. The rationale is as follows:
1) Greed : Human Nature is alwawys like this, when they win money they want more, so they raise their stakes in order to win more. If they loss, they want to recoup, similiarly, they also increase their stakes. They don't know hen to stop.
2) Getting rich overnight : People gamble to have a hope to become a millionaire overnight but how many of them are tt lucky
3) Addicted : Once you are addicted to gambling, you will always think of gambling no matter what are you doing. Once you are free, you go go gambling
4) Divorce: Some people is unable to withstand their spouse for being addicted to gambling and it ended up divorcing and the one who suffer is the children.
Hope it is useful to you
2006-08-01 04:11:35 · answer #2 · answered by Forgettable 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋