2cor 11: 3. But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ.13. For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ.
14. And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light.
15. Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also be transformed as the ministers of righteousness; whose end shall be according to their works.
Rev 12:9. And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.
as you can see here ,how they read satan being the serpent
2006-07-31 21:26:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by Biblist 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Actually is not such verse . In Genesis 3.1 is about a snake , serpent : "Now the serpent was more subtle than any of the beasts of the earth which the Lord God made". But in Apocalypse 12.9 or 20.2 is specified that "that great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, who is called the devil and Satan, who seduceth the whole world; and he was cast unto the earth, and his angels were thrown down with him"or "And he laid hold on the dragon the old serpent, which is the devil and Satan, and bound him for a thousand years".
2006-08-01 04:53:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by Viviana DanielaD 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Was the serpent then Satan? Although the Bible tells us that 'Satan himself is transformed into an angel of Light', or 'masquerades as an angel of light' (2 Corinthians 11:14), there are difficulties in assuming that something like this happened in the Garden of Eden. Theologian Henry C. Thiessen comments:
'. . . the serpent is neither a figurative description of Satan, nor is it Satan in the form of a serpent. The real serpent was the agent in Satan's hand. This is evident from the description of the reptile in Genesis 3:1 and the curse pronounced upon it in 3:14 [. . . upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy Life].
GENESIS 3:1 Now the serpent was more cunning than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said to the woman, "Has God indeed said, 'You shall not eat of every tree of the garden'?" 2 And the woman said to the serpent, "We may eat the fruit of the trees of the garden; 3 but of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God has said, 'You shall not eat it, nor shall you touch it, lest you die.' " 4 Then the serpent said to the woman, "You will not surely die. 5 For God knows that in the day you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil." 6 So when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree desirable to make one wise, she took of its fruit and ate. She also gave to her husband with her, and he ate. (NKJV)
The Bible elsewhere identifies Satan with the serpent in this story. In Revelation 12:9 and 20:2, he is called "that serpent of old, called the Devil and Satan.
2006-08-01 04:37:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anish John 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
It doesn't. The two creatures are completely seperate. The common interpretation is that the serpent represents the temptation to do evil, while satan represents an evil spirit. Anyone can be tempted, by something as mundane as a friendly serpent, but it's not too often you run into the incarnation of evil itself. That's the message... watch out for temptation.
2006-08-01 04:23:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by polly_peptide 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
There are only two verses in the whole Bible where you will find reference to Satan and a woman in the same verse.
Genesis 3:15
Revelation 12:17
Genesis 3:15 I will put enmities between thee ("thee" is Satan) and the woman, and thy seed and her seed: she shall crush thy head, and thou shalt lie in wait for her heel. (Douay-Rheims)
Revelation 12:17 And the dragon (Satan, obviously) was angry against the woman: and went to make war with the rest of her seed, who keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.
Gen. 3:15 - we see from the very beginning that God gives Mary a unique role in salvation history. God says "I will put enmity between you and the woman, between your seed and her seed." This refers to Jesus (the "emnity") and Mary (the "woman").
Gen 3:15 / Rev. 12:1 - the Scriptures begin and end with the woman battling satan. This points to the power of the woman with the seed and teaches us that Jesus and Mary are the new Adam and the new Eve.
John 2:4, 19:26 - Jesus calls Mary "woman" as she is called in Gen. 3:15. Just as Eve was the mother of the old creation, Mary is the mother of the new creation. This woman's seed will crush the serpent's skull.
There is a problem here because many modern bibles word it like this:
Genesis 3:15 "I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and hers; He will strike at your head, while you strike at his heel."
The essential difference between these two renderings concerning who will crush the serpent's head and who the serpent is trying to strike. The Douay-Rheims uses feminine pronouns -- she and her -- implying that the woman is the person being spoken of in this part of the verse. All modern translations use masculine pronouns -- he and his -- implying that the seed of the woman is the of that part of the verse.
The reason for the difference in the renderings is a manuscript difference. Modern translations follow what the original Hebrew of the passage says. The Douay-Rheims, however, is following a manuscript variant found in many early Fathers and some editions of the Vulgate (but not the original; Jerome followed the Hebrew text in his edition of the Vulgate). The variant probably originated as a copyist error when a scribe failed to take note that the subject of the verse had shifted from the woman to the seed of the woman.
People notice this variant today because the expression found in the Douay-Rheims has been the basis of some popular Catholic art, showing a serene Mary standing over a crushed serpent.
This is because Christians have recognized (all the way back to the first century) that the woman and her seed mentioned in Genesis 3:15 do not simply stand for Eve and one of her righteous sons (either Abel or Seth). They prophetically foreshadow Mary and Jesus. Thus, just as the first half of the verse, speaking of the enmity between the serpent and the woman, has been applied to Mary, the second half, speaking of the head crushing and heel striking, has also been applied to Mary due to the manuscript variant, though it properly applies to Jesus, given the original Hebrew.
This does not mean that the idea cannot be validly applied to Mary as well. Through her cooperation in the incarnation of Christ, so that the Son of God (who, from the cross, directly crushed the head of the serpent) became her seed, Mary did crush the head of the serpent. In the same way, the serpent struck at Christ on the cross, and indirectly struck at Mary's heart as well, who had to witness the death of her own Son (cf. John 19:25-27). As the holy priest Simeon had told her years before:
"Behold, this child is set for the fall and rising of many in Israel, and for a sign that is spoken against -- and a sword will pierce through your own soul also -- that thoughts out of many hearts may be revealed" (Luke 2:34b-35).
Thus Jesus crushed the serpent directly and was directly struck by the serpent; Mary, through her cooperation in the incarnation and her witnessing the sufferings and death of her Son, indirectly crushed the serpent and was indirectly struck by the serpent.
This has long been recognized by Catholics. The footnotes provided a couple of hundred years ago by Bishop Challoner in his revision of the Douay state, "The sense [of these two readings] is the same: for it is by her seed, Jesus Christ, that the woman crushes the serpent's head."
2006-08-01 04:45:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Genesis (old testament) has the story of when eve was tempted by the snake but I'm not sure if it actually states that the snake was satan.
2006-08-01 04:23:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by punkvixen 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Rev 12:9 and 20:2 are the closest things to "explicit". A study of context does, however, leave less doubt concerning this identity than there is that you asked the question.
2006-08-01 04:37:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by Zi 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Genesis 3:1
it says: "Now the serpent was more CRAFTY than any of the wild animals the Lord God had made..."
crafty- marked by skill in DECEPTION
why would God, create an animal that deceives??
who wouldn't..he was betrayed..
2006-08-01 04:25:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by just another kid. 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
None that I know of, but that may depend upon what translation of the Bible you use. The Qur'an says it was satan (not the serpent).
2006-08-01 04:25:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by RQ 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Try Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers or Deuteronomy.
2006-08-01 04:21:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋