what is the difference in a killer killing, and a person being killed on death row?

Question

besides most people who kill are not all there, but when someone is put to death off of death row it is planned by people who know better. two wrongs does not make a right.

Answer 1

you are obviously anti-abortion, right?

you're also for real prisons that those on death row NEVER have a chance to leave??

If So I'm with you... If not you are a HYPOCRITE!!

Answer 2

Death row should be band, its wrong. I would think that putting a killer to prison for a while and making them know that they killed someone is more of a reasonable punishment than death row. Some people don't deserve to die.

Answer 3

What about people who get killed in war? When the bomb was dropped on Hiroshima more people died in a single second than have ever been put to death in the US as a result of the death penalty. Why trifle over a convicted murderers death when life is so cheap that the US allows homeless people to starve or freeze to death on its streets?

Answer 4

There is a great difference. Anyone who kills another person deserves to die himself. Some killers are retarded, but not all of them are. Whatever the case, they must be stopped from killing anyone else. Executing them is the best way to guarantee that. If they go to prison, they are all too often released to kill again. We are not talking about two wrongs. Think about this. Don't buy what the Lunatic Left says without weighing it.

Answer 5

A person who is killing is someone who chooses to kill while someone on death row has done something to be put to death

Answer 6

I like this question. Well the killer killing is senseless. They don't have to do it, but out of anger or depression or whatever, they do it anyway. There bad action results in them being sent to death row. While they are there, they supposedly realize what they did was wrong, but then its too late because they already committed a crime.

Answer 7

There is a vast difference & if you can't figure it out----. Those on death row already had their chance at killing. Now they get to know what its like to look into the face of the killer.

Answer 8

maximum of your data are maximum remarkable. yet human beings are fallible and human institutions are certain to pass incorrect countless the time. The death penalty device is not any exception. approximately costs: the fees of the actual execution represent a tiny area of the widespread costs. some examples: Examples- trial costs (death penalty and non death penalty circumstances, California): human beings v. Scott Peterson, death Penalty Trial $3.2 Million entire human beings v. Rex Allen Krebs death Penalty Trial $2.8 Million entire human beings v. Cary Stayner, death Penalty Trial $2.368 Million entire human beings v. Robert Wigley, Non-death Penalty Trial $454,000 entire this documents is for circumstances the place the terrific records have been stored. learn after learn has found that the death penalty is plenty extra high priced than life in reformatory. with the aid of fact the stakes are so intense, the legal technique is plenty extra complicated than for the different form of criminal case. the biggest costs come on the pre-trial and trial ranges. those prepare whether or no longer the defendant is convicted, no longer to show sentenced to death. life with out parole, on the books in maximum states, additionally prevents reoffending. It ability what it says, and spending something of your life locked up, understanding you’ll never be loose, is not any picnic. 2 huge reward: -an harmless guy or woman serving life could be released from reformatory -life with out parole costs under the death penalty

Answer 9

Killer killing = no law of protection.

Person put on death row = many many many law options and proection.

So what do you do when you have a known killer who WILL kill again...let him/her go to kill again, put them to death or put them in jail so they could kill someone who was put in jail for a lesser crime such as petty theft or a lesser criminal to stole because he cant feed his family and has no education.

So if the killer is in jail and he/she kills a lesser criminal and kills one every other year; think about it -- death of a killer is much better than that.

Answer 10

Killing is killing. One is an individual killing of his/her own free will, the other is the state killing of its own free will.

I really can't fathom the reasoning that killing someone is OK; and especially with the discovery of DNA evidence revealing that a number of people are on death row incorrectly.

Answer 11

you pose an excellent question.I'm from canada where luckily there is no death penalty.A killer is mentally ill and usually their crimes are premeditated.I don't agree with the death penalty,however the law is the law.I'm not highly religious or anything but I don't feel anyone has a right to choose your life expectancy here on earth except for god.I also beleive though that good or bad,things happen for a reason.