Or...has he set a new world record for "Conspiracy Theories" ?
Or...both?
2006-07-31 16:36:41 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Civic Participation
I think its funny how other Christian people often think that because the man says he "loves the Lord" and he is a "christian" that they should give him their support or that makes him A-OK. I'm a saved, sanctified, born-again Christian who knows that Jesus Christ had common sense above all things and that He warned against hypocrites. The Pharisees "loved God" too, but their ACTIONS spoke louder than their empty words. Does a man who's priorities are out of wack and who mandates the killing and invasion of other people and their land mainly for personal interests and for oil under an apparent guise of "democracy" really deserve the Christian vote? PLEASE. God doesnt want a bunch of dummies serving Him. I think that Bush is an extremely misguided individual who I'm sure has committed more crimes than any other US president to this date. Some Christian.
PS I'm not "liberal" nor am I a "conservative". I am a CHRISTIAN and Jesus was a revolutionary who stood up to the powers that be when they were wrong. THATS God.
2006-07-31 17:23:13 · answer #1 · answered by prtybrwneyez1 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Can't wait to hear some of these nutcase conservatives try to shift the question over to Bill Clinton.
Bush is about a bad a president as it gets folks.
For one he scammed investors when he was part of arbusto oil.
Violated the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty
Rigged 2 elections
Was an alcoholic and Coke head
Never reported to duty in the Air national guard when he found out he might have to go to Nam and fight Charlie
Another wards Bush is a drunk, drug addict, thief, felon, deserter, and a crybaby.
2006-07-31 16:53:29 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
a million. Your data are incorrect, Nixon did no longer sponsor the break in at Watergate, he basically lined it up and because he became certainly one of those in my opinion vile human no longer in basic terms the Democrats yet many Republicans wanted him impeached. 2. Bush did no longer scouse borrow something. the human beings charged with legally finding on the election consequences did no longer locate incorrect doing 'any further' than usually happens in elections. Robert Kennedy's article is undesirable or a minimum of too overdue. Oliver Willis suggested, "I don’t in my opinion have confidence ‘04 became stolen, however the theft of 2000 became rather sparkling. yet its additionally form of moot. There’s no undoing the two election, and on an identical time as the stressful situations from the two Al Gore and John Kerry weren't energetic adequate, if the margin of victory became extra clever than 0.5% and 3% those issues don’t matter in any respect. definite, the Democratic social gathering ought to have as certainly one of its foundational aspects that it fights for the main remarkable to have each vote counted - yet those varieties of ideals pass nowhere if we lose elections in a squeaker." 3. Bush's strikes have never been proved 'unlawful', hence with the aid of fact he did no longer lie approximately some smegma on a gown he's risk-free from persecution and prosecution. additionally, the "lies" he informed congress are the comparable "lies" Clinton used to bomb Somalia. they are the comparable "lies" that Kerry and the French, Italian, Israeli, Russian and English intelligence informed us and one yet another. 4. Bush's direct strikes did no longer reason the death of somebody. the people who pulled the set off on the airplane into the international commerce centers began the Dominoes of death. each action has an equivalent and opposite reaction. Radical Muslims have confidence they have a top to kill any unbeliever. the situation that Bush and a good style of others have confidence is that self determination is the terrific thank you to have any human beings govern themselves.
2016-11-03 10:30:31 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What violations are you talking about or are you just another empty headed liberal trying to set a world record for throwing out baseless charges and empty slogans?
2006-07-31 16:40:18 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not President Bush but maybe you are the one, for letting all kinds of fallacious epithets, from a hole you have inherited to breath, so called "your MOUTH" and that is because the air is still free, according to you friend and confidant, of course I am only intelligently assuming, Al Gore. I am not entirely right about you little engendered liberal shnookie worm?VJC
2006-07-31 16:51:26 · answer #5 · answered by caledonia 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both.
He probably ties with Hitler atm as far as violations but Hitler didn't have anywhere near the amount of conspiracy theories circulating.
2006-08-01 00:25:49 · answer #6 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
both 1. violations 2. stupidity
2006-07-31 16:41:54 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
personally i think george w. bush is a wonderful president. he is a great leader & has faith in the lord. he is so sweet and kind & isn't afraid to stand up for what he believes in, even if it might not be popular. i think we're fortunate to have him as our president, its such a shame people cant always see that.
2006-07-31 16:51:54 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think the first one...
What other horribly things are there left for him to do? He's done them all!? Unless he kills and eats a baby, then im pretty sure he can't top anything he hasn't already done.
2006-07-31 16:41:31 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only time will tell. our children will read about... we will too since we will live way in the hundreds
2006-07-31 16:40:59 · answer #10 · answered by Richgirl 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋