I have a hard time understanding how Julia's imposter is allowed to continually ask obnoxious questions while using her name and likeness. This cowardly person is too chicken hearted to make statements in his own name so he chooses to hide behind a spiritual woman. Could it be this person has an inside connection with Yahoo or worse yet even be employed by Yahoo? Hmmmm.... What do you think?
2006-07-31 16:01:29 · 4 answers · asked by cave man 6 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Actually. Debbie you couldn't be any more incorrect. Three days ago the real Julia posted a question asking "Can you help me? Can you report the person who has been impersonating me. She has since changed her name.
2006-07-31 21:23:33 · update #1
Aw Debbie. You just gave me your opinion in the the same manner Julia has given her opinion. How ever you haven't answered my question have you? How is that the person impersonating her is able to get away with it? He or she is making vile remarks against Christians and straight people everyday and is getting away with it. How and why does Yahoo allow this to happen when my friendly Sunday morning greeting to everyone Christians and non christians was deleted. This kind of leads me to think that the perpetrator has to be someone working for Yahoo. Right?
2006-07-31 21:31:58 · update #2
I'm very suspicious
2006-07-31 16:19:04 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
I haven't seen the real Julia on here making any attempt to put it right. If SHE's not bothering why are YOU so up in arms about it ? I don't agree with impersonation but I reckon Julia had it coming to her. She can't expect to get away with bigoted , abrasive and judgmental remarks against non-xians and gays & lesbians forever.
If she is so great why did she deliberately hang round the gay & lesbian section spewing her vitriol ? I am personally straight but I DO take offence to people like Julia who harass everyone else who doesn't think the same narrow-minded way that she does.
Perhaps this is a hard-learned, much needed valuable lesson for her.
2006-08-01 00:31:59 · answer #2 · answered by debisioux 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sounds very suspicious. What other explanation can there be. Impersonation is a violation but yet this person is still allowed to carry on as if nothing is wrong. I am sure there has to be hundreds of complaints. I don't get it.
2006-07-31 23:37:35 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sounds suspect to me.
2006-07-31 23:16:10 · answer #4 · answered by godzilla 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋