George Bush or Hillary Clinton? And in answering, keep it civil, don't call anyone names and try to make it a good argument. Give examples. And check your work.
2006-07-31 15:08:27 · 10 answers · asked by Steve R 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Civic Participation
They both have their problems , but we already know that we can't live with Bush's .
Will Hillary be better or worst , we won't know till she actually runs and we hear what she has to say .
And we can't always know then .
Remember what Bush said to the voters to get elected and has he lived up to his word ?
2006-07-31 15:22:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
She herself isn't somewhat divisive (different than that she's a liberal in a central authority the place the two conservatives and liberals are drifting extra far off from center floor), yet she is symbolic of a prior administration that a lot of human beings discover particularly divisive.
2016-12-10 19:08:25 · answer #2 · answered by niang 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is a trick question because I do not believe that Bush is making his own decisions.
But for argument sake, I will play along. I would say that Bush is too decisive. He is decisive to the extreme... to the point that once he makes a decision and then it has been proven to be made in err, he will not refute it.
EDIT ADDED: Ok it is late, I relooked at this and you said divisive not decisive. LOL
Nevermind, I'm tired. Got a good laugh on this one.
2006-08-01 00:44:42 · answer #3 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hillary has no real platform and if she is anything like her husband in his run for office she will easily outpace any opponent
in divisiveness.
New york ushered her in with very little competition. Wait for her run in 2008 when she has to work for her food. The clintons are dirty name calling. lying , back stabbing, race baiting , class warfare, democrats. example 92 96
In order for her to win she will have to appeal to women - who are never satisfied
immigrants -who are never satisfied
minorities - who are never satisfied
under educated service workers - who are never satisfied
they are all victims waiting to be discovered- just wait and see what she does "divisive" wont be the word
2006-07-31 15:18:50 · answer #4 · answered by PAUL W 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe Hillary. I think Bush is ignorant to allot of his parties agenda. Basically he's a tool. His office is used to propagate by others while he is blind to being used.
2006-07-31 15:15:25 · answer #5 · answered by carsonbeeching 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush is, and Hillary is going to be. Find somebody else, please!
The very survival of 'justice and world peace' depends on it.
More specifically, somebody who is not an Israeli 'stooge'.
2006-08-01 01:56:45 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Equal. They seem to be on the extreme on both sides. I say we elect John McCain. He calls himself a republican but votes more like a democrat. That ought to make everybody happy.
2006-07-31 15:15:50 · answer #7 · answered by AmericanSwede 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
My guess is Hillary, but we'll see in 2008.
2006-07-31 15:13:07 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither they both seem to have a hard time with the truth
2006-07-31 15:13:30 · answer #9 · answered by Zen 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes Prof. I will cross my "T" and dot all my "I"
2006-07-31 16:42:21 · answer #10 · answered by Richgirl 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋