Ironically, I agree with AM.
After 30 their bodies start sagging and they start whining. Since I can pass for mid twenties it is just strange for me to be seen with someone so old looking. Twenty one is too immature for me. Twenty-five to twenty-seven works for me. My personal best is an eight year age difference him younger of course.
2006-07-31 15:55:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It depends. I find that men in their 40s are sexy in a mature kind of way. Younger men (20s) are so physically attractive with their buff, cut bods. I love a guy in a baseball cap.
2006-07-31 21:44:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by hotnurse115 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
older men are nerve wrecking because their set in their ways, youngers one are not on anything worth taking seriously but if all you want is fun go for it but remember its always a young tender thing popping up some where to catch his eye
2006-07-31 21:41:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by me-me 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Depends on what you're looking for....if you want to have a wild time with usually no attachments then go youger....If you want stability and a possible commitment go older...the choice is yours. I prefer from 30 to 40, they still young and flexible and probably got they life together and are paid!
2006-07-31 21:41:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by thisalln 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am 32 and my boyfriend is 28. My rule is after u hit 30, you go down, not up LOL
2006-07-31 21:40:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by A M 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, some of them are fun, but they have to be mature too.
2006-07-31 21:39:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by Kayt 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
older if they act mature Which hardly any of them are. I haven't found one yet.
2006-07-31 21:41:40
·
answer #7
·
answered by christinadc2002 3
·
0⤊
0⤋