English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

37 answers

You could easily blow isreal off the map, that would ease alot of the tensions in the middle east. But islam is too widespread throughout the world to remove with a few bombs. A better solution would be for both sides to quit being jerks, then kiss and make up.

2006-07-31 13:08:43 · answer #1 · answered by Ann Tykreist 3 · 8 4

I don't think a nuclear bomb is necessary, and regardless of what we think, God is sovereign over the nations. At some point in the future, we will see the prophecy of Ezekiel 38-39 fulfilled, when Israel's enemies will come from the north, and try to defeat them. God will intervene, and nothing can stop Him.

In the meantime, until He does, there is a lesson that Israel needs to learn, and then teach its enemies. Because the story is lengthy, I will merely post the link, and those who choose to, can read the story. It is highly relevant to today's conflicts in the middle east.

http://bogieworks.blogs.com/treppenwitz/2006/07/thanks_i_needed.html

2006-07-31 13:09:58 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Well, it would end the notion that there were civilizations involved.

In fact what we have is a conflict between fundamentalist religious groups, with western civilization caught in the middle. The longer we ignore that the more likely it is that Christianity and Judaism will drag down western civilization in this clash.

2006-07-31 13:02:00 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Sure, the nuclear bomb solves all major issues instantly. Everyone’s afraid to use them because of environmental concerns, or some lame sh*t like that. I vote pull out the biggest nuclear bomb we have, aim it at the biggest pain in the azz, and pull the trigger…

2006-07-31 13:05:42 · answer #4 · answered by psychoticlawnjockey 4 · 0 0

No. On the contrary, a nuclear bomb would only mark the beginning of the conflict...

2006-07-31 13:01:03 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

ok, right here that's in a nutshell. The "West economic corporation" became as quickly as element of the country of Palestine. while Palestine ceased to exist in 1948, the WB became absorbed by Jordan (something of Palestine grew to grow to be Israel.) interior the 1968 conflict, the West economic corporation became seized by Israel. although, the late King Hussein of Jordan (of which the WB became formally a factor of) ceded the land to the Palestinian human beings. It by no skill, shape, of style belongs to Israel, neither is it IN Israel. that's a small chew of what became initially Palestine between Israel and Jordan....you may discover it on a map. to declare (as Samsoona does) that it decrease than protection stress "supervision" is laughable; that's decrease than Israeli protection stress occupation. specific, that's a chew of land----one the place Palestinians lived and thrived. Israel has been in violation of United countries mandate 242 because 1968 requiring them to furnish the land decrease back to the rightful proprietors. Israel, although, keeps to construct unlawful settlements there. There you're, no non secular mumbo-jumbo, merely the info :) Edit: I stand in awe of Duane's amswer, and that i bow right down to him :)

2016-10-01 07:54:54 · answer #6 · answered by coke 3 · 0 0

oh yah definitely, but do we really want to go there?

hiroshima>? during ww2. after we bombed them they didnt surrender right away... tooke them like 5 days to realize that losing lives over saving face isnt worth it. when we bombed them 90% of the ppl the were killed or hurt were civilians.

the Big Nuclear bomb is NOt the way to go. because even then, they would prolly still have tension

2006-07-31 13:01:58 · answer #7 · answered by Steph is tight like a tiger 2 · 0 0

The whole trouble had started 1948 when Israel became a State...if Hitler would've done his job right...instead making soap and lampshades out of Jew...their would've been no Jews left...that why we are in a mess today...just go ahead and drop it now...at least I got something to watch on my Satellite TV

2006-07-31 13:16:32 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The war would only escalate on a bigger scale. Other countries might threaten nuclear retaliation, and the results might not be confined to the middle east.

2006-07-31 13:07:35 · answer #9 · answered by LaRue 4 · 0 0

Yes and quite possibly all the rest of us, We do not want to go nuclear, it would be terrible for mankind and we will never see this world and it's beauty the way it should be, such weapons can end it all.

2006-07-31 13:03:22 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

...not to try to provoke, and not to make the suggestion, but it seems that there can never be peace when there are a small percent on each side who are zealots and truly believe that God promised them the same small piece of real estate (Jerusalem and the Temple Mount). But hypothetically, if that particular real estate were uninhabitable for about a million years...

2006-07-31 13:00:39 · answer #11 · answered by rj 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers