Why does anyone bother to quote "answers in genesis"?

Question

First off, I think cheapens the bible message by attempting to use scientific data to "prove" the act of creation.

But as for answers in genesis (aig) they're a ministry for the institute for creation research (icr).

How can an institution be "scientific" but require all of its members to swear an oath affirming their belief in certain specific conclusions, regardless of the scientific evidence?

As for Scientific credentials? Not even close. Only a few have a degree in any of the life sciences. 3 have doctorates in education, 2 theologians, 5 engineers and the rest are a physicist, a chemist, a psycho-linguist, and a "food scientist".

I'm sure that there are scientists who do believe in creationism, just as there are scientists who believe in Bigfoot. But validity in science is decided by the evidence and data.

Despite 25 years of effort, none of the ICR scientists have yet come forward with any credible evidence which refutes the evolutionary model of biological development.

Holy circular logic batman!

Here I am showing you how the AIG/ICR "scienticians" are a sham with no science that stands up to scrutiny, and you go ahead and quote more.

Think outside the bible people! Why does no one outside the religious community put any creedence on the creation story?

Please answer the question, but please don't use more discredited AIG/ICR quotes.

Answer 1

answeringgenesis dot org is a thoroughly discredited website. Even some creationists make list of things that creationists should not use to get thier point across. That website is one of them.
It's a laughable attempt by someone with a woeful education to convince the terminally stupid or the retarded that creationism is anything other than mythology.
Of course, it's not...

Answer 2

At the same time evolutionary model is not complete and thus does not refute the creation model.

One thing people get hung up on this the "Seven Days" if you look closely you will see that "Time" as we know didn't get created until "day 4" so how much time really pasted up to "day 4" is unknown.
I have a feeling we will at some point come to realize the answer is creation and adaptation (not evolution).

Answer 3

Then I guess you'll have to use Faith to fill in the gaps.

Don't laugh and brush me off as another fanatic who puts his brains on hold and just "believes" whatever the Bible says.

It takes faith to believe in evolution. Sure you think you have scientific "proof", but we believe we have scientific "proof" that creation is correct (which you would know if you read any of the web site you quoted).

http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/qa.asp

Faith is the final ingredient. I believe there is more "proof" for my way of thinking and you believe there is more "proof" for your way.

We all have to believe something, don't we? It is a decision we all make.

After all the Bible says we all have a choice to make. I have made mine.

Answer 4

remeber no evolutionist has ever found a way to start the world other than a creator. besides there is lots of evidence twords creation it is just that evolutionists have the power of the mainstream media so that is all people hear.

Answer 5

Live and let be. Is the ICR causing you harm in any way? They have a right to their opinion.

Answer 6

To some, the Bible is the whole shooting gallery.

All the answers you need are in there and all the answers you will ever need are in there.

Answer 7

Eve was Framed

Answer 8

It has been done countless times did you research for yourself?

Answer 9

I guess you'll have to ask the people who do so.

Answer 10

there has to be questions regarding genesis